Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00055
Original file (MD01-00055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00055

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 001013, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the Disabled American Veterans as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010615. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (with admin discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, and continue to support the FSM's request for an upgrade of his Other Than Honorable discharge to a general Under Honorable Conditions, or Honorable.

The above request is based on the following; it well known that a FSM cannot go back and change the mistakes that have been made, but they may become a positive and productive member of society, and that such post-service changes should be given due consideration.

The record reflects that (applicant) served from April 27, 1987 to June 24, 1988. Then during the period of service from May 10, 1988 to June 24, 1988, the record notes the actions of (applicant), with the concluding actions of the United States Navy by reason of misconduct. Post service information show the FSM to have become an active and productive member of society, one who is respected by his peers.

Active service performance reports show all high marks in proficiency of 4.4, 4.3, 4.3, and then a 2.5 for the time period of the inappropriate action. This FSM had an outstanding record, made one mistake and is now to pay for that mistake for the rest of his life. The FSM had an outstanding work record, made one mistake, received no counseling from his unit, was allowed no probation or rehabilitation, and was given an Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge.

 If the Navy hid counseled the FSM, and if the Navy had offered probation and rehabilitation (P&R), and the FSM continued to show misconduct then this service would agree with the issuance of the OTH discharge. But since this was the first offense, and the Navy created an impropriety by not allowing P&R or counseling the FSM, and since the FSM was an outstanding member prior to the incident we believe and maintain that a General Under 14onorable conditions would have been a more appropriate discharge.

In light of (applicant's) good service and the credible statements of his peers and coworkers, and the addition of a statement from his local police agency showing 15 years without a violation, we ask that clemency used in this instant case with the change being granted in the manner of a General Under Honorable conditions, as requested by the FSM.

We ask for the Board's careful and sympathetic consideration of all the evidence of record used in rendering a fair and impartial decision. These issues do not supersede any issues previously submitted by the applicant.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Police record check dated December 2, 1999
Character reference, undated
Character reference, undated
Copy of newspaper article

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                870221 - 870426  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870427               Date of Discharge: 880624

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 01 28
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 51

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (4)                       Conduct: 3.9 (4)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS /Misconduct-Drug abuse (admin discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

870219:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
880510:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Wrongfully use marijuana, a schedule I controlled substance on 14Apr88.
Awarded forfeiture of $335.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 30 days, reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
880607:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

880610:  GCMCA [Commanding General, I Marine Expeditionary Force, FMF] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

Partial discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 880624 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.

 Additionally, the applicant states that he was not afforded probation, rehabilitation or counseling. A part of the applicant’s discharge package is missing from the applicant’s discharge package and service record, therefore, the Board presumes regularity on the behalf of the government. If the applicant desires drug rehabilitation, he is encouraged to contact the nearest Veteran’s Administration Office for eligibility. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210 MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 4, effective 29 Jul 87 until 26 Jun 89.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00573

    Original file (MD01-00573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was my first brush with trouble.After a review of the Fortner Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appeallant of an upgrade of his current Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.The record reflects the FSM served in the United States Navy from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00276

    Original file (MD00-00276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant states in issue 1 that “the discharge I received was unfair” because he was “honest and withheld nothing during” the interviews. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00671

    Original file (MD01-00671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received a general discharge under other than honorable conditions for testing positive for drugs. I am asking the board to consider my service record prior to my discharge and grant me an upgrade to my discharge. st Marine Division] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01018

    Original file (MD03-01018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. As the FSM has submitted documentation in support, we as the representative, ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00691

    Original file (MD01-00691.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00691 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Employment/Character Reference Letter Character Reference Letters (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00986

    Original file (MD01-00986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00067

    Original file (MD00-00067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Certificate of Commendation PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940218 - 940822 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 940823 Date of Discharge: 961011 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 17 Inactive: None ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00277

    Original file (MD00-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00993

    Original file (MD01-00993.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thankfully the court agreed and I was sentenced to probation and discharged from the USMC. 920129: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to civilian conviction. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00853

    Original file (MD01-00853.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the applicant's service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. It is in the best interests of the Marine Corps to separate SNM ASAP.”920427: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a General characterization of service by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by positive urinalysis for cocaine.920429: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted...