Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00067
Original file (MD00-00067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00067

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 991014, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to misconduct. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000614. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 19 months of service with no other adverse action. To the contrary, 11 months was served at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where a certificate of commendation was earned. Request my discharge be upgraded to General, Under Honorable Conditions, taking into consideration the mistake I mad I honestly regret. Thank You.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of Certificate of Commendation

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940218 - 940822  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940823               Date of Discharge: 961011

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 34

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (5)                       Conduct: 4.0 (5)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, OR, HSM, JMUC, Rifle Marksmanship Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940217:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

960628:  Counseled concerning lost I.D. Card form DD 2MC.

960709:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Poor judgement and irresponsibility, Specifically; SNM was counseled for being 35 minutes UA from a BLT formation at 1800 on 960707] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

960805:  NAVDRUGLAB [JACKSONVILLE, FL], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 960726, tested positive for [THC].
960809:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully used a controlled substance (THC).
 Awarded forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and
extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-2. Not appealed.
960813:  Commanding Officer, B Company, 1 st Battalion, 8 th Marine requested applicant be processed for administrative separation for Drug Abuse based on positive report of urine sample test, recommended discharge Under Honorable Conditions (General).

960816:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
960819:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

960821:  Substance Abuse Evaluation Report: indicates applicant was evaluated on 960821 as command referral, the counselor's diagnostic impression was Drug Abuse/Isolated Incident, and was confirmed by a medical officer's diagnosis, recommended administrative separation.

960821:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was PFC M_____'s illegal drug use which resulted in him testing positive for THC on a urinalysis given on 960719 as confirmed by Naval Drug Lab, Jacksonville, Florida message 051010Z Aug 96

960913:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

961002:  GCMCA [CG, 2d MarDiv] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 961011 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. Relief denied.

 The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00986

    Original file (MD01-00986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00276

    Original file (MD00-00276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant states in issue 1 that “the discharge I received was unfair” because he was “honest and withheld nothing during” the interviews. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00639

    Original file (MD01-00639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E). However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00593

    Original file (MD99-00593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered: None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC 000000 - 000000 HON Inactive: USMCR(J) 950418 - 951127 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951128 Date of Discharge: 980625 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 06 28 Inactive: None CA action 980603: Sentence approved...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01157

    Original file (MD01-01157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding General directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1. The Board found no evidence that the applicant’s personality disorder was responsible for the applicant’s decision to use illegal drugs.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00319

    Original file (MD01-00319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870717: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 870706, tested positive for THC.870823: Applicant received Level I drug and alcohol counseling and placed on unit's urinalysis screening program. Not appealed.871030: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 871019, tested positive for THC.871125: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01333

    Original file (MD03-01333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01333 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030805. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 000814: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.010123: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01069

    Original file (ND99-01069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Resume (2pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 840514 - 890814 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840412 - 840514 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890815 Date of Discharge: 910412 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 07 28 Inactive: None ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01101

    Original file (MD01-01101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01101 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010814, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 960702: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.960703: Commanding...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00277

    Original file (MD00-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.