Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00964
Original file (ND00-00964.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND00-00964

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000823, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010201. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. (Equity Issue) This former member opines that a dysfunctional childhood contributed to and sufficiently mitigated his misconduct of record to warrant discharge under honorable conditions.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Twelve pages from applicant's service record
Statement from applicant dated January 31, 2000
Character reference dated January 9, 2000
Letter from Licensed Psychologist date March 8, 1999
Character reference, undated
Character reference dated November 3, 2000
Character reference dated November 8, 2000
Character reference dated November 6, 2000
Copy of college transcript
Copy of transfer coursework to official transcript

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930108 - 930207  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930208               Date of Discharge: 940711

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 04
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 56

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMA                  Behavior: NMA             OTA: NMA

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 29

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

931007:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
931107:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Commanding Officer's NJP conducted on 7Oct93 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

931202:  Applicant arrested by civilian authorities and charged with a felony of willfully using force and violence against a police officer.

931206:  Civil conviction Municipal Court for the Alameda Judicial District for violation of willfully using force and violence against a police officer. Charge was reduced to a misdemeanor.
         Sentence: Probation for 3 years, jail for 45 days, fined $150.00.

 940311:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence, violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing movement, violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespect toward a petty officer and willful disobedience toward a petty officer.
         Award: Forfeiture of $416 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.
940414:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction.
940414:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
940422:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction.

940505:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 940711 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that although the applicant may have had a dysfunctional childhood, this does not excuse his misconduct while in the Naval service. The applicant had 2 NJPs and a civilian conviction in his short 1 year and 5 months in the Navy. The applicant’s felony charged was reduced to a misdemeanor, but it illustrates the seriousness of the crime committed. The applicant is responsible and must be held accountable for his actions. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 87, missing movement if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00582

    Original file (ND00-00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00582 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000410, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (Equity Issue) As evidenced by his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01171

    Original file (ND99-01171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00989

    Original file (ND00-00989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-OSSN, USN Docket No. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “My discharge was based on one isolated incident out of 2 years continuous naval service with no previous disciplinary problems.” The applicants misconduct, violation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00817

    Original file (ND03-00817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to Entry Level Separation or Uncharacterized. Award: Forfeiture of $211 per month for seven days and 14 days restriction and extra duty. 001113: DD 215 issued correcting characterization of service to "Under Honorable Other Than Honorable Conditions).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00231

    Original file (ND03-00231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. “Please consider changing my character of discharge and RE code for the reasons noted in the attached letter.”Comments submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (American Legion): On behalf of the above referenced applicant, and in accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01159

    Original file (ND03-01159.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00945

    Original file (ND99-00945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 22 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 50 Highest Rate: FR Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: NMA Behavior: NMA OTA: NMA Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized Absence: 52 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. No...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00978

    Original file (ND00-00978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010209. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. The Board has no obligation to change the applicant’s discharge in order to “help further his potential.” No relief will be granted based on this issue.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00405

    Original file (ND99-00405.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900612: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the Commission of a Serious Offense. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 900615 under Other Than Honorable conditions for misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01396

    Original file (ND03-01396.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. No indication of appeal in the record.911223: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...