Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00961
Original file (ND00-00961.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-BMSN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00961

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000821, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010209. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION
Issues

1. My discharge was improper due to the fact of my service time from Jan 82 - June 96 that was the only big factor they judge my discharge on. I would like the Board to review my service record and consider on upgrading my discharge to an Honorable. Thank-you

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        820118 - 851030  HON
                  USN                       851031 - 870426  HON
                  USN                       870427 - 901128  HON
                  USN                       901129 - 920130  HON
                  USN                       920131 - 940731  HON
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     810731 - 820117  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940801               Date of Discharge: 960619

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 10 19
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 31                          Years Contracted: 2

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 18

 Highest Rate: BM1

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.90 (2)    Behavior: 3.00 (2)                OTA: 3.90        4.0 evals
 Performance: 3.00 (1)    Behavior: 3.00 (1)                OTA: 3.00        5.0 evals

 Military Decorations: NAM

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: BER (3), NDSM, SSDR (4), SASM (2), NMCOSR, HSM, MUC, GCM (3)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 116

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article formerly 3630650.



 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950802:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs): Disobey order or regulation.
         Award: Reduce to BM2. No indication of appeal in the record.
951205:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 5Dec95.

960328:  Applicant declared a deserter.

 960415:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 2130, 15Apr96 (116 days/surrendered).
950506:  Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 0700, 5Dec95 until 2130, 15Apr96.

960531:  A pplicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of his request. The applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s) with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of all the charges preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 5Dec95 until 2130, 15Apr96. The applicant stated he was completely satisfied with the counsel he had received. The applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

960605:  The commanding officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed applicant’s discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960619 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The applicant’s issue states: “My discharge was improper due to the fact of my service time from Jan 82 - June 96 that was the only big factor they judge my discharge on. I would like the Board to review my service record and consider on upgrading my discharge to an Honorable. Thank-you.” The NDRB found no impropriety in the applicant’s discharge. There is no rule or regulation that requires assignment of discharge characterization based on time in service. The record clearly shows the applicant accepted an other than honorable discharge in order to escape a trial by court martial for his unauthorized absence of 116 days. Relief is not warranted.

 The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge. There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant provided no post service documentation for the Board’s consideration.

The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.












Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 2 Oct 96, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article [e.g., 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days] upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00046

    Original file (ND01-00046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states: “I acted solely on the advice of my counsel to accept an other than honorable discharge.” The Board does not find this issue decisional. Relief is not warranted.The applicant’s second issue states: “My prior Honorable Discharge and Honorable Service was not considered at the time....

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00540

    Original file (ND03-00540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00540 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030212. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. “I served honorably for 2 years before I made the mistakes in May, Jun & July of 1997.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00693

    Original file (ND00-00693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00693 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000508, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. haracter references educational achievements post service letters will follow.” The Board never received any additional information from the applicant, therefore no relief is granted based on this issue.In the applicant’s issue 3,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01243

    Original file (ND03-01243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01243 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030717. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960717 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00659

    Original file (ND04-00659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00659 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040311. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reentry code changed so that he may reenlist. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01065

    Original file (ND03-01065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01065 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030609. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to hardship. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00236

    Original file (ND01-00236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970626 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00871

    Original file (ND03-00871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant found fit for confinement.020327: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00557

    Original file (ND00-00557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00557 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990119: Charges preferred to court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 0715, 7Dec98 to 2130, 15Jan99 (39 days/surrendered).pplicant requested an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00605

    Original file (ND99-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00605 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000104. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 850115: Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Active Mariner program.880630: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.