Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00899
Original file (ND00-00899.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-OSSA(SW), USN
Docket No. ND00-00899

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000713, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010125. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. My discharge was based on 1 incident during the term of service in the navy. I feel my discharge should be upgraded to honorable based on the following achievements I have acquired during my term of service and that I also served 2 years of honorable service in the Indiana national guard, and completed their combat medical school. In order to enlist in the I.A.N.G. I have to enlist for 6 years and I plan to do those honorably. My discharge from the navy was based on being in the wrong place at the wrong time. During the first year on board the Leyte Gulf CG-55, I managed to earn and receive the ESWS Certification as an E-2, and receive sailor to the quarter. Reviewing my record will show that I was serious in persuing a career in the armed services, but my mistake changed my life, and I am making an effort to rejustify myself. I ask that you look and consider what I have done and what I am doing in the armed service for my upgrade to honorable not just the 1 incident that you for your time.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter for Recommendation for Advancement
Copy of Service School Academic Evaluation Report (4pgs)
Letter from Applicant
Copy of EMT Acceptance Letter
Copy of MOS action
Copy of Police Record Check
Copy of Certificate of Completion (BICSI)
Copy of U.S.Army Diploma (Medical Specialist Course)
Copy of Certificate of Recognition from Surgeon General United States Army
Letters of Appreciation (4)
Copy of ESWS Certificate
Copy of ESWS Designation Letter

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     931223 - 940221  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940222               Date of Discharge: 961007

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 07 16
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 64

 Highest Rate: OSSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (1)    Behavior: 4.00 (1)                OTA: 4.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, BATTLE"E"RIBBON, NUC, ESWS

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960918:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
Award: Forfeiture of $490.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
960918:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
960918:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
961012:  Commanding Officer, USS LEYTE GULF (CG-55) recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

960930:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 961007 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided ample documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00224

    Original file (ND00-00224.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000803. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Employment Letter of Recommendation Copies of Enlistment Performance Evaluation Reports (5) Copy of Enlistment Performance Record (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 861110 - 930531 HON USN 930601 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01106

    Original file (ND99-01106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s first issue, he implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The applicant is asked to read the Navy Personnel Manual, Article 3630620 (A), concerning the standards for a service member discharged due to drug abuse. You may obtain a copy of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00690

    Original file (ND00-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960405: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “ average conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were good” and he “received letters of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00731

    Original file (ND00-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    990225: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended retention. The final discharge authority was the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) who directed the applicant be discharged, but provided leniency by authorizing a general (under honorable conditions) characterization. At this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01282

    Original file (ND03-01282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENTex-ET1, USNDocket No. One who made a mistake on his time (leave) & has paid for it for over 6 ½ years now- PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19961127 with a general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to drug abuse (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00190

    Original file (ND01-00190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-HTFN, USN Docket No. ND01-00190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00195

    Original file (ND01-00195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00195 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00314

    Original file (ND99-00314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00314 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981230, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to reentry to a 3 or below. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 961202 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01023

    Original file (ND00-01023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-01023 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000831, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to separation from service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to applicant’s issues 1 and 3, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01094

    Original file (ND03-01094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000525 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service...