Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00224
Original file (ND00-00224.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-BM3, USN
Docket No. ND00-00224

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 991203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000803. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. Item 24 DD214 Oct 4, 1995, this should have been honorable, I was treated very unreasonable by receiving a less the honorable discharge. I had served over 8 years before this very minor incident, minor compared to the over 8 years of honorable service without a blemish, ended my career. I have attached copies of my evaluations while serving. They were 4.0. I did my job honorably and exceeded the necessary performance required. I wanted to make a career out of the Navy and volunteered for some very tough assignments while serving. I never messed up in the over 8 years of service and this one incident should not have ended a good sailor's career. I realize that I made a mistake but nothing that should have been punishable by a life sentence of a bad discharge an incident like this in civilian life would probably have gotten me probation for 30 days. Please upgrade my discharge after reviewing my active military file and the letter from my current employer.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Employment Letter of Recommendation
Copies of Enlistment Performance Evaluation Reports (5)
Copy of Enlistment Performance Record (2)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        861110 - 930531  HON
                  USN                       930601 - 950402  HON
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     861016 - 861109  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950403               Date of Discharge: 951004

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 02
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 2

Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 68

 Highest Rate: BM2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (1)    Behavior: 4.00 (1)                OTA: 4 .00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM(2), NAVY"E"(2), AFEM, JMUA, NAM, SSDR(4)

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950403:  Reenlisted onboard USS VELLA GULF (CG-72) for 2 years.

 950804:  NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE, FL urinalysis report indicates applicant tested positive THC.
950809:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $741.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-4. No indication of appeal in the record.
950809:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment.
950809:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
950824:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

950911:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be not drug dependent.
950921:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 951004 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that although the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      




Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00899

    Original file (ND00-00899.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00899 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000713, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01106

    Original file (ND99-01106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s first issue, he implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The applicant is asked to read the Navy Personnel Manual, Article 3630620 (A), concerning the standards for a service member discharged due to drug abuse. You may obtain a copy of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00690

    Original file (ND00-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960405: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “ average conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were good” and he “received letters of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00948

    Original file (ND99-00948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 25 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 66 Highest Rate: STG2 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 4.00 (2) Behavior: 4.00 (2) OTA: 4.00 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, NRSSR, GCM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 2 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. PART III –...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00905

    Original file (ND02-00905.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00905 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020610, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940819 - 960402 COG Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00731

    Original file (ND00-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    990225: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended retention. The final discharge authority was the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) who directed the applicant be discharged, but provided leniency by authorizing a general (under honorable conditions) characterization. At this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00615

    Original file (ND01-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded to the highest possible level due to the fact that I had one isolated incident in 30 months of service, and have otherwise an exemplary service record. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the applicant was discharged. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE B.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00529

    Original file (ND00-00529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :970313: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Underage drinking. No indication of appeal in the record.990408: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse evidenced by admission and commission of a serious offense as evidenced by CO's NJP for violation of UCMJ Article 92, held on 970313 and pattern of misconduct as evidenced by CO's NJP for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00594

    Original file (ND99-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. In response to the applicant’s issues 2, 3, 5,10 the normal characterization for misconduct-drug abuse is other than honorable. In addition to the drug abuse, the applicant was UA for 10 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01199

    Original file (ND99-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Appealed denied 931104.931105: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.931105: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 940211 under other than honorable conditions for...