Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00730
Original file (ND00-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00730

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000517, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. I need to have an upcharge so that I can see a doctor about getting some information.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR            890727 - 891004  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 891005               Date of Discharge: 930406

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 08 10
         Inactive: 00 02 12

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 8

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 33

 Highest Rate: AN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.53 (3)    Behavior: 3.33 (3)                OTA: 3 .53

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

891005:  Ordered to active for 36 months under the Active Marine Program.

 910821:  Retention Warning from VP-31: Advised of deficiency (Failing to progress towards rate), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

921005:  Applicant to civil confinement.

 930205:  Civilian Conviction at Santa Clara County Superior Court, San Jose, California for violation of California Penal Code Section 273A(1), causing pain and endangering the health of a child.
         Sentenced: Incarcerated for 303 days at Elmwood Correctional Facility in Milpitas, fined of $200, and placed on 5 years probation.
930304:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by your felony conviction at the Santa Clara County Superior Court, San Jose, California, on 930205 to the charge of violating California Penal Code Section 237A(1), causing pain and endangering the health of a child.
930304:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to submit statements on own behalf either verbally or in writing before an Administrative board or in writing if an Administrative board is not convened.
930322:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and civilian conviction.

930325:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 930406 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The Board found that the applicant was convicted on 930205 of violating California penal code 273A(1), causing pain and endangering the health of a child. He was sentenced to 303 days in jail, fined $200 and placed on probation for 5 years. The applicant committed a serious offense while in the Navy and the Board found the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable, based on his conviction and the seriousness of his offenses.

 In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board has no obligation to change the applicant’s discharge in order that he may then see his “doctor about getting some information.” No relief will be granted based on this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00849

    Original file (ND02-00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    930702: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00238

    Original file (ND04-00238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-MRFN, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00402

    Original file (ND01-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the applicant's service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. 900917: Special Court Martial Charge I: violation of UCMJ, Article 86 Specification - Unauthorized absence from on or about 18 Jun 1990 until on or about 22 June 1990. There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601192

    Original file (MD0601192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. (20000519) SJA review (date): (20000615)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, MARINE CORPS BASE WESTERN AREA (20000616)Narrative Reason directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20000708 Additional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600335

    Original file (ND0600335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or attached document/letter: “To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to request that my discharge status be changed. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00828

    Original file (ND02-00828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of DD Form 215 Service Related Information Listing from Applicant dated November 16, 2002 (2) Copy of DD Form 215 Status Request Letter from Applicant to NDRB PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0292

    Original file (FD2001-0292.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the notification letter indicates SSgt Huff “must consult legal counsel before making a decision to waive any of [his] rights,” AFI 36-3208, paragraph 6,13.1 contains no such requirement. Accept the respondent’s unconditional waiver of his rights associated with a discharge board and order him separated from the Air Force for Misconduct - Civilian Conviction with an honorable, general (under honorable conditions) or UOTHC service characterization with or without P&R; or a | -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0219

    Original file (FD2001-0219.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the notification letter indicates SSgt Huff “must consult legal counsel before making a decision to waive any of [his] rights,” AFI 36-3208, paragraph 6,13.1 contains no such requirement. Accept the respondent’s unconditional waiver of his rights associated with a discharge board and order him separated from the Air Force for Misconduct - Civilian Conviction with an honorable, general (under honorable conditions) or UOTHC service characterization with or without P&R; or a | -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00786

    Original file (ND00-00786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USNR 900802 - 930620 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900115 - 900801 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930621 Date of Discharge: 950608 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 11 18 Inactive: None The applicant's service is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00338

    Original file (ND00-00338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.930119: USS DULUTH (LPD-6) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious civilian offense, to wit: reckless driving (due to intoxication); misconduct due to a civilian conviction, to wit: violation of California civil law VC 23103(A) reckless driving (due to intoxication); misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the following...