Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00181
Original file (ND00-00181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-FN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00181

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 991118, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000727. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630605.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. I'm requesting a upgrade for reasons that should have never been discharge for the reason they gave me, but here's my side which I tried to explain to them is that I was getting letters of indebtedness, is because my wife at the time had my atm card and pin # and she didn't let me know that she had it, do when we were trying to survive out of my check book, and then when the letters started rolling in I payed the m majority over and sending money to her because she was still my wife at the time I missed one time of paying my nexcard so here I was in captain mast recommended to be discharged. Which navy legal assistance said I shouldn't be discharged either so here I am now asking for a upgrade in discharge and re-code.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        911219-960303    Hon
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960304               Date of Discharge: 961213

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 09 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 68

 Highest Rate: EN3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)    Behavior: 3.00 (2)                OTA: 3 .60

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR(3), MUCR, JMUCR, NRSSDR, NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630605.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

No discharge package.

960304:  Reenlisted onboard USS WADSWORTH (FFG-9) for 4 years.

 961025:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 123a: (6 Specifications), Unlawfully make to the Navy Exchange a check without sufficient funds with intent to deceive, violation of UCMJ Article 107: (2 Specifications), Make a false official statement.
         Award: Oral reprimand, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 961213 under Other Than Honorable conditions for misconduct due to Commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant claims his ex-wife had his ATM card and pin number and he was not aware. The Board made many attempts to obtain the applicant’s discharge package but the package was not available. The applicant was discharged with a General (under Honorable conditions) for misconduct due to Commission of a serious offense. The applicant went to NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 123a (6 specifications); unlawfully making to the Navy Exchange a check without sufficient funds, with intent to deceive, and Article 107, making a false official statement. There is no record of the execution of the applicant’s due process rights. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to show his command improperly discharged him or that the characterization of his discharge was inequitable. The Board assumed regularity in the conduct of government affairs. Relief is denied.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 971212, Article 3630605, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. In Appendix 12 of the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 107; False official statement and Article 123a, for Checks, etc, insufficient funds , intent to deceive, if adjudged at a Special or General Court Martial

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00459

    Original file (ND04-00459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “To Whom It May Concern:Applicant) am requesting a review of my military record to obtain an Honorable Discharge versus a General, Under Honorable Discharge to obtain my education benefits from the Veterans Affairs Office. Therefore, she was discharged from the naval service with a characterization of General, under honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00689

    Original file (ND99-00689.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00689 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990426, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Issues I respectfully request that you review my records and upgrade my Other Than Honorable Discharge to Honorable.I truly believe that my discharge was entirely unfair to my family, the Navy, and me. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00278

    Original file (ND02-00278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 941108 Date of Discharge: 990404 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 04 27 Inactive: None Unknown: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01271

    Original file (ND03-01271.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:DD Form 149, dated February 16, 2001 Letter of Commendation for December 13-18 1996 Letter of appreciation, dated February 6, 1998 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00211

    Original file (ND04-00211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ]990528: Commanding Officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant contends that his ability to serve in the Navy can be attributed to his “youth,” “marital and family and child care programs,” and “personal problems.” While he may feel that his personal problems and immaturity...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01014

    Original file (ND00-01014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    930805: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501545

    Original file (ND0501545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from T_ T. C_ (Applicant), undated, not signedNational Personnel Records Check for Applicant, dtd November 4, 2005 Ltr form National Personnel Records Center, dtd February 13, 2006 Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00874

    Original file (ND00-00874.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00874 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000707, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Instead, the applicant’s command approved the applicant’s request for separation in lieu of a trial by court martial under other than honorable conditions. In the applicant’s issue 2, the applicant contends that he was not offered proper counsel.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00172

    Original file (ND99-00172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My family is also going through counseling as well and it has proved to help them tremendously. I recommend that MSSN (applicant) be separated with an Other Than Honorable discharge.970922: Commander, Naval Base, Norfolk directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Changes in the applicant’s life since his discharge do not change the facts leading up to and the reason for his discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00887

    Original file (MD03-00887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PVT, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Request for a Certificate of Eligibility PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...