Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00771
Original file (MD00-00771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00771

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000530, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010201. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. Claims I was identified by a random urinalysis test, when in fact I was self admitted.

2. Attached written request.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant (3pgs)
Copy of CO's Message
Copy of Separation Travel Pay Certificate

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                911002 - 911210  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 911211               Date of Discharge: 930216

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 06
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rank: PVT

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (3)              Conduct: 3.5 (3)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Rifle Marksman Badge, LOC

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 13

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS /Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910928:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

920603:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Conduct was substandard in that you violated military regulations by your underage consumption of alcoholic beverages in Jacksonville, N.C. on 920530] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
920603:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Unlawfully and willfully consumed an alcoholic beverage, and unknown quantity of beer, in a manner not authorized by North Carolina General Statue 18B, while under the legal drinking age of 21 years, in violation of the law referred at 1800 on 920530, in Jacksonville, North Carolina.
 Awarded forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and
extra duties for 30 days. Not appealed.
920915:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 920910, tested positive for THC.

921029:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 0400, 921014 to 1837, 921027, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana, a controlled substance on or about 920831.
 Awarded forfeiture of $360.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-1, reduced to PVT. Not appealed.
undated:         SACO evaluation indicates applicant tested positive on unit test.

921210:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The basis for this recommendation is your NJP which evidenced the illegal use of drugs.
921210:  Applicant advised of his rights and having not elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

921210:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, specifically his abuse of illegal drugs.

921219:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be psychologically drug dependent.

930113:  Applicant declined Veterans Administrations' Drug and Alcohol Program.

930115:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

930203:  GCMCA [Commander, 1 st Marine Division (REIN)] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 930216 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found nothing in his records to substantiate his claim that he self admitted the use of THC. The Board found that the applicant was one of 190 Marines who under went a urinalysis test on 3 Sept 1992. He was one of 2 whose samples came back positive for drug usage. Furthermore, the Board found that the applicant acknowledged, on his enlistment contract, that he had tried marijuana 4 times prior to that time. Relief denied.

In issue 2 the applicant stated “I was feeling discouraged and using poor judgement decided to go along with a few others on an idea of popping on a urinalysis, and admitting that I had used, if not discharged we would …” . Clearly this statement indicated to the Board that the applicant was aware of his actions and the repercussions that could have ensued. Relief denied.

The applicant wishes to serve in the Navy. This Board has no jurisdiction over the enlistment of personnel into the Navy. The applicant should see a Navy Recruiter.

 The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. However, there is no law or regulation that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must be found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice is evident in the applicant’s service record. In determining whether a case merits a change based on post-service conduct, the NDRB considers the length of time since discharge, the applicant's record of community service, employment, conduct, educational achievements, and family relationships. The applicant should produce evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided that an application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00458

    Original file (MD03-00458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970430 - 970721 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970722 Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00474

    Original file (MD01-00474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined this issue has no merit. This urinalysis test was four months after the applicant enlisted into the Marine Corps. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00942

    Original file (MD04-00942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00942 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040518. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00311

    Original file (MD01-00311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant's age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00485

    Original file (MD00-00485.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the NDRB determined this issue is without merit. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant's performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. At this time the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01307

    Original file (MD02-01307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC 000000 - 000000 HON Inactive: USMCR(J) 991217 - 000807 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000808...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00577

    Original file (MD01-00577.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E). He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00966

    Original file (MD01-00966.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00966 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issues 1 and 2.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00399

    Original file (MD99-00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :920213: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.930622: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: disobey a lawful written order, to wit: MARCORPBASEJAPANO 10120.1A, by driving a POV without a driver's license.Awarded forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 1 month. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00092

    Original file (MD04-00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00092 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031015. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Page from Applicant’s medical record Discharge summary from Philhaven Behavioral Health Care Services Letter of treatment from N_...