Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00599
Original file (MD00-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00599

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000410, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001201. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSAT PARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. This Marine feels that the discharge this Marine received is improper because: 1) The grounds fo this Marines Other Than Honorable Discharge were because of "unsatisfactory participation in the United State Marine Corp Reserve -specifically 10 unauthorized absences, "despite the fact that this Marine unit was well informed of the reasons surrounding those absences 2) Nothing in this Marines service record book deems this Marine as an unsatisfactory participant in the Marine Corps Reserve in fact, up until this unfortunate incident this Marine had not so much as missed one drill in this Marines two year and one month of service, and 3) This marine was discharged well in advance (6 mos to be exact) of any verdict being reached in this Marines case therefore, this Marine feel he was not given just consideration during the discharge proceedings but was just rather written off.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant (6pgs)
PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC                       None
         Inactive: USMCR                    None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 921230               Date of Discharge: 970107

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 01
         Inactive: 03 06 XX

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 10                        AFQT: 41

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.46 (5)             Conduct: 4.4(5)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge, NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 10

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSAT PARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE; authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

921230:  Enlistment contract into the USMCR documents acknowledgement of the requirement to participate in 48 scheduled drills and not less than 14 days of annual training per year for 6 years upon completion of initial active duty training.

941122:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Concerning illegal drug involvement; specifically, the use of Butalbital which was identified through urinalysis testing (NAVDRUGLAB msg R 250851Z Oct 94)] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

950929:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Concerning his unexcused absences from the 8-10 Sep 95 drills, (5) drills. This brings your unexcused absences to a total of (5)] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. (not signed by applicant, failure to attend drill)

951015:  Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Applicant receipted for letter by return signature but failed to acknowledge the contents.

951015:          Applicant advised of his rights, and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. [The failure to acknowledge official certified mail constitutes acknowledgement and waiver of all rights (MARCORSEPMAN par. 6303)]

951018:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Concerning his unexcused absences from the 13-15 Oct 95 drills, (5) drills. This brings your unexcused absences to a total of (10)] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued [not signed by applicant, failed to attend drill).

951018:  Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Applicant receipted for letter by return signature but failed to acknowledge the contents.

960105:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. The general basis for this recommendation was unsatisfactory performance in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve, the specific basis of this recommendation is unexcused absence from 10 drills and an unexcused absence from annual training.

961028:  Commanding General 4th Marine Division recommended the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

961204:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

961204:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Forces Reserve] directed the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970107 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A, B, and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).

I n response to member’s issue, while his command may have been aware of the reason for his missed drills (i.e. confinement by civilian authorities), this knowledge did not provide or imply official sanction of member’s absence from his assigned duties. Because member’s own misconduct (as evidenced by his later conviction), was the reason for his absence from drills, the command acted in accordance with regulations by directing his administrative separation based on these missed drills. The command was not required to await resolution of his criminal case by civilian authorities. Relief denied.
 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve Participation and Administrative Procedures, paragraph 300.

C. Table 61 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95, Guide for Characterization of Service.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

F. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00937

    Original file (MD01-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).Issue 1 states: “I believe my discharge was undeserved since it was based entirely on one mistake made during an otherwise honorably served tour.” The NDRB finds the applicant’s issue without merit. The applicant missed 70 reserve drills. The applicant did not provide any of these documents.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00209

    Original file (MD00-00209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00209 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991129, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.951015: Commanding officer notified the applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.951106: Commanding officer notified the applicant of unsatisfactory...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01381

    Original file (MD03-01381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 961011: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.961103: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation in reserve, specifically failure to attend regular scheduled drills on 961102 and 961103].

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00498

    Original file (MD03-00498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Would like to reenlist.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. 970409: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00021

    Original file (MD03-00021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00021 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. While the Board commends the Applicant for the positive accomplishments he has made since his discharge, the Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00761

    Original file (MD00-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00761 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000523, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, or general/under honorable conditions, or entry level separation, or uncharacterized but would prefer honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990420 under other than honorable conditions due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00413

    Original file (MD02-00413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00413 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant not available for signature.001109: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.001203: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01268

    Original file (MD02-01268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01268 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020906, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. Marines in this unit have made numerous attempts to contact Private A_ (Applicant) and try to bring him into a satisfactory drilling status with this unit.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00911

    Original file (MD00-00911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00911 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000712, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I was then re-evaluated about a month later where the Doctor recommended no combat duty. 961208: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00915

    Original file (MD01-00915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that a change be made to the characterization of my discharge due to the fact that I left my unit in the face of injustice. 970606: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. The Board found no evidence of racism against the applicant in a review of his service records.