DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket:NR5858-13 |
15 October 2613
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) Titie 10 7.8... L552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/296
of 12 Sept 2013
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5/ABH2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide
advancement cycle.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSTON
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NRO5858-13
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/ABH2 from the September
2011 Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of
16 June 2012 and a Time In Date of 1 January 2012.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
A. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Aimee’ f
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
15 October 2013
rn 5 one er
rx WwW, DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4748-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5737-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3473-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/AZ2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and for the change in rank to be reflected on her DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and,. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4691-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5165-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7714 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Rxnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00402 12
00402-12 12 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 2 ae Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was selection board eligible from the E-7/QMC January 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected for advancement. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05938-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-5/A02 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4583-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and ; injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...