DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
- BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR04748-13
17 October 2013
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/219
of 25 Jul 2013
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to
E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the
partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Boara consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request warrants partial
relief as described below.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following partial corrective
action.
Docket No.NR04748-13
RECOMMENDATION :
That Péetitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advance to E-4/HT3 from the March 2013 Navy-
wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16 June 2013 with a
Time In Rate date of 1 January 2013.
b. That so much of Petitioner’s request for corrective action as
exceeds the foregoing be denied for the following reason: Petitioner
did not score a high enough multiple from the March 2011, September
2011, March 2012, and September 2012 exams to be advanced.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c} of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federai Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
Drone f Loom
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY,
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6({(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
17 October 2013 LS y
W. DEAN PFEIFRER
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00379 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/HT3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/HT3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3473-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/AZ2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and for the change in rank to be reflected on her DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and,. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3410-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tie Ce oie eo Tes Gon fae PE See Nar TY TPL a ae ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NR03410-13 22 August 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF - RECORD 1CO (i, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5391-13
Be DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO05391-13 16 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy el Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5122 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two points for his Individual Augmentation (IA) from June 2011 to April 2012 for the September 2012 E-6 Navy-wide advancement examination. Docket No.NR05122-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all.the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...