DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ney AE som COR RSS a or Nagy 44, PE TORTNE
De, NPL ae es Tt
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN ;
Docket No.NR04432-13
19 August 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
13 August 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures aa
applicabie to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC)
memo 5420 PERS-8354/030 of 24 Jul 2013, a copy of which is being
provided to you.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
Making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. Please be advised that the Board also
believed that you did not satisfactorily serve in the higher pay grade
as an E-7/HTC and that after 30 years, a reinstatement to E-7/HTC is
not automatic. The names and votes of the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Dire t
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02626-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5266 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the additional evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09620 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7540 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7542 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03868-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4846-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office “having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR273 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 January 1989. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03536-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11467-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...