DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BART TOE CORPECTION OU Naua Dregne
SOGRE: FOF COR for NAVAL SE COR OT
ao 8. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22904-2480
BAN
Docket No.NR03930-23
20 August 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 August 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion ({A/O) furnished by Naval Personnel Command
(NPC} memo 1430 Ser 811/209 of 24 Jul 2013, a copy of which is
provided to you.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire.
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Therefore, your case has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval..record, the burden. is on the applicant to
demonstrate. the. existence of probable material error ‘or
injustice. sai a .
- Sincerely,
We Na PREIRE a
Executive Di t
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4432-13
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures aa applicabie to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14
NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4344 13
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR4344-13 36 Nov 13 # e to your applic ur naval isions © ation for correction of yo £ 10 USC 1552. rection of Naval Records, e Board for cor your appli ion, considered d injustice were ance with. gs of this Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3980 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 21 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08216-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11079-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7873 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. hiter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12228-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5473 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5281 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 17 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.