DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUA Best DOS SEDQTIOS OF AAV AL
701 §: COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BESe yee
' BAN
Docket No.NRO3629-13
.20 August 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your.
‘application on 20 August. 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in- accordance with: administrative:
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ©
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion (A/O) furnished by Naval Personnel Command
(NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/216 of 29 Jul 2013, a copy of which is
provided to you.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
‘insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Therefore, your case has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
. official naval record, the burden .is on the applicant to ~
demonstrate the existence of _probable material. error or:
injustice. oe
Sincerely,
W. Bomey
Executive Dir
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3930-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4960-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when’ applying for a correction of an | official naval record, the burden is’on the ‘applicant .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09620 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4825 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error OF injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR413 13
You requested that your discharge of 10 August 2009 be voided; that you be awarded constructive service credit from 11 August 2009 to the date you would have attained 20 years of active duty service; ‘that all *red flag” actions be removed; that you be considered by a special selection board (SSB) for advancement to pay grade E-7; and that all records reflecting the substantiation of the sexual assault allegation against you be removed. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4646-13
You requested that the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March 2012 to 15 March 2013 be modified by raising the mark in block 45 (*Promotion Recommendation - Individual”) from “Promotable” (third best of five possible marks} to “the appropriate and proportional rating deserving of the work put forth.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2014. Documentary material considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0816-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR475-13
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the fitness report in question as you requested. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting removal of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4073-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 41 October 2013.. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4703-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session; considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...