Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2433-13
Original file (NR2433-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
‘ ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SUN
Docket No: 02433-13
26 February 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552..

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire .
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error oF
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

27 September 1983. The Board found that on 29 September 1983,
you were briefed on the Navy's policy regarding drug and alcohol
abuse. During the period from 16 October 1986 to 6 March 1987,
you received three nonjudicial punishments (NJP’s) for assault,
apsault with a deadly weapon, communicating a threat, drunk and
disorderly conduct, driving under the influence of alcohol, and
missing three restricted musters. Subsequently, administrative
discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a
pattern of misconduct. You waived your rights to consult
counsel, submit a statement or have. your case heard by an.
administrative discharge board (ADB). On 3 April 1987, your case
was forwarded recommending that you be discharged under other ~
than honorable (OTH) conditions by reason of misconduct, On

21 April 1987, medical personnel found that you were dependent on
alcohol and recommended that you be transferred to 4
rehabilitation center for treatment prior to your separation. On
5 May 1987, the separation authority directed an OTH discharge by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. On 7 May
1987, you elected to receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment
prior to being discharged. You were discharged with an OTH
characterization of service on 30 July 1987.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of
service, post service accomplishments, character letters and

desire to change your discharge. Nevertheless, the Board

‘concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
‘recharacterization of your discharge given your three NUP’s, two

of which were after you were warned of the consequences of
further’ misconduct, and the fact that you were briefed on the
Navy's policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse. The Board also

noted that you waived the right to an ADB, your best chance for

retention or a better characterization of service. Accordingly,
. your application has been denied. The names and votes of the

members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

ROBERT D, ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3028-13

    Original file (NR3028-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the fact that you were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2933-13

    Original file (NR2933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10122-07

    Original file (10122-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period 12 November 1982 to 18 February 1983, you had three NUP's. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07239-08

    Original file (07239-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 April 1983, you were counseled regarding your unsatisfactory performance and conduct, advised that the command would assist you with alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08887-10

    Original file (08887-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06760 12

    Original file (06760 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 15 May 1987. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05807-08

    Original file (05807-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4115 13

    Original file (NR4115 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05757-10

    Original file (05757-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, the Board also noted on 5 June 1987 you were offered the right to request in-patient alcohol rehabilitation treatment from the Veterans Administration Hospital nearest your home, but signed a waiver refusing treatment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4039 13

    Original file (NR4039 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. You were so discharged on 23 May 1988. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.