Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2933-13
Original file (NR2933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

SIN
Docket No: 02933-13
10 April 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 April 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support

thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient:
to establish the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
26 dune 1983. The Board found that on 28 June 1989, you were
briefed on the Navy's policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse.
On 20 July 1990 and 6 May 1991, you received nonjudicial

- punishment (NJP) for sleeping on watch, underage drinking and

wrongful use of marijuana and cocaine. Additionally, you were
counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in
administrative discharge action. During the period from 24 May
1991 and 10 February 1992, you received four additional NJP’s for
two periods of unauthorized absence, breaking restriction,
wrongful use of marijuana, and defrauding another Sailor.
Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. You elected
to consult counsel and have your case heard before an

‘administrative discharge board (ADB). On 10 March 1992, the ADB
found that you had committed misconduct and recommended
separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge by reason
of misconduct. On 18 March 1992, you received a seventh NJP for
failing to go to your appointed place of duty and breaking
restriction. On 1 April 1992, your commanding officer concurred
with the ADB’s findings and forwarded his recommendation that you
receive an OTH discharge. On 29 April 1992, the separation
authority directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due
to a pattern of misconduct. You were so discharged on 28 May

1992.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, record of
service and desire to upgrade your discharge. Nevertheless, the

' Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant

recharacterization of your discharge given your seven NJP’s, two
of which were for wrongful drug use, the fact that you were
briefed on the Navy’s policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse,
and warned of the consequences of further misconduct after your
second NUP. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case. are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D, ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1830-13

    Original file (NR1830-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that on 24 September 1990, you were briefed on the Navy's policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3634 13

    Original file (NR3634 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the fact that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06760 12

    Original file (06760 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 15 May 1987. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2415-13

    Original file (NR2415-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    — A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3612 13

    Original file (NR3612 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 July 1993, you received a third NJP for UA and wrongful use of cocaine.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2474-13

    Original file (NR2474-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8883 13

    Original file (NR8883 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8898 13

    Original file (NR8898 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4115 13

    Original file (NR4115 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05258-09

    Original file (05258-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. On 13 May 1992, you received NUP or wrongful use of Marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.