Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05028-12
Original file (05028-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BUG
Docket No: 5028-12
27 August 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

Toe Secretary of the Navy

subj  opeetmennediiiiiistiania intial
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Forms 149 (two) dtd 24 Apr 12,
each w/attachment
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 30 May 12

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry
dated 11 June 2008 and the page 11(a) entry dated 14 October
2009, copies of which are at enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dikeman, Green, and
McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 23 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to the Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
c. The page 11 on which the contested entry dated 11 June
2008 appears also includes an uncontested entry.

CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error

and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by
removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)”) entry dated 11 June 2008. This is to be accomplished
by reconstructing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That his record be corrected further by removing the
service record page 11(a) entry dated 14 October 2009. This is
to be accomplished by removing the page 11(a) on which the entry
appears, or completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be
read, rather than merely lining through it.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

 

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Gore I. Qretr
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

eere_W. DEAN P IFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01766-10

    Original file (01766-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 29 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hess and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08

    Original file (10092-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14

    Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7373 14

    Original file (NR7373 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 21 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). 2, The Board, consisting cf =} iis MMMM, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03374-08

    Original file (03374-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3374-08 17 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ¢ Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Subject, filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval e service record page 11 (a) entry dated 2 February 2008, a 2. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01920-10

    Original file (01920-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5548 14

    Original file (NR5548 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 16 January, 19 Pebruary,,amd-18 March 2003 (copies at Tab A). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 16 January and 19...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14

    Original file (NR3392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...