Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11288-10
Original file (11288-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SIN
Docket No: 11288-10-
4 Bugust 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy .
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Fnel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary mI
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an

active duty enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with

this Board requesting that the nonjudicial punishment (NTP) he
received on 16 May 2008 be removed from his official Military

Personnel File (OMPF) and Navy Standard Integrated Personnel
System (NSIPS).

>. The Board, consisting of Mr. Blanchard, Ms. McCormick, and
Mr. J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 2 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows: ,

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. On 16 May 2008, Petitioner received NJP for failure to
obey a lawful order. He was awarded a reduction in paygrade and
a suspended forfeiture of pay.

c. In his application, Petitioner states that his commanding
officer (CO) set aside the NUP, and ensured him that it was going
to be like it never happened. Further, that he was reinstated to
paygrade E-6 with his original time in rate, and all forfeitures
of pay were returned. However, the NJP ig still reflected in his
records.

d. On 28 July 2011, the CO, USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER
(CVN 69), CAPT H---, who was Petitioner's CO at the time of the
NIP onboard the USS PELELIU, forwarded an e-mail to this Board.
It stated, in part, that while he no longer has Petitioner's
records, he most certainly “set aside” the NUP he received on
16 May 2008. Essentially, he wanted his record to be as if it
never occurred, and it was not to be noted in his evaluations, or

be a part of his official records.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the supporting e-mail from Petitioner’s CO
at the time of NUP, the Board concludes that his request warrants
Favorable action in the form of relief.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s NUJP of 16 May 2008

should be removed from his OMPF and NSIPS.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's Court Memorandum (NAVPERS 1070/607)
and Administrative Remarks (NAVPERS 1070/613) counseling warning
dated 16 May 2008 be removed from his OMPF and NSIPS, along with
all associated documentation relating to it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material direct to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to this Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRIAN A GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

W. DEAN PF

Executive D Lr

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06403-11

    Original file (06403-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his application, he submits a letter from LNC(SW/AW) C---, who was the command legal chief at the time of the NUP onboard the USS WASP (LHD 1), dated 21 June 2011, stating, in part, that Petitioner had requested to have his NJP removed from his record, and it had been approved up the chain of command, which included his own signature. He also submitted another statement from his leading Chief, MMCM S~--- at the time of his NJP who also stated, in part, that his request to have his NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07838-10

    Original file (07838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    JAMS stated that the NUP “stemmed from [Petitioner’s] failure to report a civilian DUI arrest,” however, the UPB entry actually says he was punished “for failing to notify his command of his DUI conviction [emphasis added] .” JAM5 noted that “the requirement to report the conviction (rather than the arrest) is lawful.” d. Enclosure (4) explains that PERB directed removing the contested fitness report in light of enclosure (3). e. In enclosure (5), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command (MCRC)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06586-11

    Original file (06586-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 06586-11 28 July 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Garst, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1978-13

    Original file (NR1978-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade-oef his other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service and removal of his 1 August 1980 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Dixit, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07004-11

    Original file (07004-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) he received on 16 April 2009 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Garst, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03984-11

    Original file (03984-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 03984-11 28 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: ta) 10 U.S.C; L552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich, Mr. Lippollis, and Mr. Butherus, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 April 2011 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08352 12

    Original file (08352 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. On 1 August 2012, the commanding officer denied Petitioner’s request to set aside the NUP, stating in part that, his decision to award it for the incident was based on his admitted arrest and the voluntary statement given to the command after he waived his right to remain silent. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08343-00

    Original file (08343-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 JAM7 1 5 AUG 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS SERGEAN ERY MC (BCNR) APPLICATION Our The 17 Background. We are again asked to provide an opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his official military personnel file (OMPF) of the 17 December 1996 letter from his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05066-11

    Original file (05066-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) regarding a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) dated 2 September 2010 and to be reinstated to paygrade E-5. The ADB found that the government had failed to prove wrongful use of a controlled substance and recommended retention. f. An advisory opinion (AO) from the Military Law...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...