Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06223-11
Original file (06223-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 6223-11
29 Aug 11

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

ee

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enci: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N322 of 9 Aug 11
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, PEeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 August
2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the

enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
Docket No. 6223-11

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He was enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, effective 13
December 2010 (Active Duty Service Date). Petitioner met the advanced
paygrade criteria based on college credits. NOTE: The change in the
effective date of advancement to E-3 may also impact on Petitioner’s
E-4 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was eligible for, but did
not take an E-4 examination because the above change had not yet been
tiade, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed
opportunity. Petitioner should take the next available E-4
advancement examination. Then compare the Final Multiple Score (FMS)
received on that examination with the FMS that was required for the
“missed” examination. If the score received meets or exceeds the
score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may
reapply te this Board for consideration of advancement to E-4
retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the
“missed” examination cycle. A DD Form 149, a command
endorsement /recommendation, and a copy of this letter must be included

with the request. The Board will determine whether the request will
be approved.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

~
[lluen. bE
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS? III

Recorder Acting Recorder
Docket No. 6223-11

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 {e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e}} and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

29 August 2011 Cf
Fea Wy. DEAN IFFER

Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05905-11

    Original file (05905-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05479-11

    Original file (05479-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13703-10

    Original file (13703-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06866-08

    Original file (06866-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6866-08 25 Aug 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO | __ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00395-11

    Original file (00395-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00784-11

    Original file (00784-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13161-10

    Original file (13161-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05726-09

    Original file (05726-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter: referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective ~ action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12497-10

    Original file (12497-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06012-08

    Original file (06012-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...