Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06866-08
Original file (06866-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 6866-08
25 Aug 08

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO | __

    

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 14 Aug 08
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected

to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 August
2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and

policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and

warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration.of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds

the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 6866-08

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He was enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, effective 26
February 2008 (Active Duty Service Date). Petitioner met the advanced
paygrade criteria based on Delayed Entry Program (DEP) referrals.

b. NOTE: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-3
may also impact on Petitioner’s F-4 advancement opportunity. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-4 examination
because the above change had not been made, the following procedures
will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. Petitioner should
take the next available E-4 advancement examination. Then compare the
Final Multiple Score (FMS) received on that examination with the FMS
that was required for the "missed" examination cycle. If the score
received meets or exceeds the score that was previously required for
advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-4 retroactive to the date he would have been advanced
on the “missed” examination cycle. A command
endorsement/recommendation and a copy of this letter must be included,
the Board will determine whether the request will be approved.

c¢. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Al

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

(pet SN Fe

Foe W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

25 August 2008

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04941-08

    Original file (04941-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05757-08

    Original file (05757-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12367-08

    Original file (12367-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05726-09

    Original file (05726-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter: referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective ~ action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06012-08

    Original file (06012-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05519-09

    Original file (05519-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07856-09

    Original file (07856-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sep 09 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05905-11

    Original file (05905-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06016-09

    Original file (06016-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Navy Recruiting Command's established policy requires all applicants desiring enlistment in a higher paygrade produce official transcripts prior to their ship date. Recruiters brief all applicants...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05373-08

    Original file (05373-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, based on college credits earned in foreign institutions prior to her enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its...