Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05165-11
Original file (05165-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-3100 PRC

Docket No: 05165-11
22 June 2011

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
LO} Secretary of the Navy

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a),
Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the United

States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the removal
of a nonjudicial punishment (NTP) which occurred on 5 May

2009.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Mr. Spain, and Mr.
Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 22 June 2011, and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence
of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicabie
statutes, regulations and policies, and enclosures (1)

through (3).

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner did
exhaust all administrative remedies available under
existing law and regulations within the Department of the

Navy -

b. Enclosure (i) was filed in a timely manner.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 2 October 2008.
He served honorably until 5 May 2009, when he received NUP
for an unauthorized absence. His commanding officer set
aside the NUP. Although the NUP has been removed from his
service record, it has not been removed from his official
military personnel file (OMPF) or his evaluation report and
counseling record for the period 16 June 2008 to 15 June
2009. ,

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of
record, and especially in light of Petitioner's set aside
letter from his commanding officer, the Board concludes
that his request warrants favorable action.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of
an error warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by
removing his NIP of 5 May 2009.

b. That Petitioner’s record be further corrected by
modifying his evaluation report and counseling record of 16
June 2008 to 15 June 2009 as follows:

(1) Change block 36 (Military Bearing/Character from
“2,0” (Progressing) to “NOB” (Not Observed) ).

(2) Remove from block 43 (Comments on Performance)
the following comment: “Blk 36: Found guilty of violating
UCMI Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence). Awarded 17 days
restriction and 17 days extra duty.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected,
removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner's record
and that no such entries or material be added to the record
in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board,
together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 923.6(c) it is certified that
a quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above

entitled matter.
Cnn} Arg

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in
Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation,
Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its
provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the

Secretary of the Navy.
A) ‘Rog F

By directio

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13

    Original file (NR933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06586-11

    Original file (06586-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 06586-11 28 July 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Garst, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07142-11

    Original file (07142-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) imposed on 28 July 2009. In this regard, the Board concludes that since his commanding officer's intent is to get aside the 28 July 2009 NJUP, it and all references surrounding the circumstances of it in his record should be removed or obliterated. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07004-11

    Original file (07004-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) he received on 16 April 2009 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Garst, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03984-11

    Original file (03984-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 03984-11 28 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: ta) 10 U.S.C; L552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich, Mr. Lippollis, and Mr. Butherus, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 April 2011 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00078-12

    Original file (00078-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 12 June 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11288-10

    Original file (11288-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Blanchard, Ms. McCormick, and Mr. J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 16 May 2008, Petitioner received NJP for failure to obey a lawful order. It stated, in part, that while he no longer has Petitioner's records, he most certainly “set aside” the NUP he received on 16 May 2008.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04493-09

    Original file (04493-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    04493-09 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub): i co , REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. PERS-00J ltr dtd 10 Aug 09 w/enclosure PERS-834 ltr dtd 21 Aug 09 PERS-32 memo dtd 2 Sep 09 ty a ea mw “4: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing all reference to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03999-10

    Original file (03999-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 8 December 2007 to 8 August 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing all remaining references to his NJP of 7 August 2008, to include the following: {1) Unit Punishment Book entry (2) Second sentence,...