Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04761-11
Original file (04761-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BIG
Docket No: 4761-11
29 September 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

   

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c, 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Apr 11 w/attachments
(2) CMC MMSR ltr dtd 16 Sep 11
(3) Subj‘s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected to show two
additional qualifying years, so that he will be given an
opportunity to qualify for reserve retirement benefits.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Exnicios, and
Whalen, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 27
September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner was discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve
on 30 June 1984 with 14 years, one month, and 18 days of
commissioned service, but with only seven years of qualifying
service. He was then reappointed in the Marine Corps Reserve
on 2 April 2002 at age 52. He currently is serving as a
lieutenant colonel (pay grade O-5) and has 18 years of
qualifying service, but will be 62 years old on 30 October
2011. Only chaplains, medical specialists, and officers in pay
grade 0-7 or above are allowed to serve beyond the age of 62.
His Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) is 31 October 2011. Although
he is in the 18 year sanctuary zone, he cannot continue to
serve beyond his 62nd birthday. He requested to continue to
serve beyond his MRD, but was denied (enclosure (2}).

c. Petitioner has two anniversary years where he did not
earn enough points to make them qualifying years for reserve
retirement purposes. A qualifying year consists of a minimum
of 50 points. These two unsatisfactory anniversary years end
on 11 May 1977 and 11 May 1978.

CONCLUSION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting
relief. The Board finds that he is willing to continue to
serve, but his age denies him that opportunity. The Board
concludes that after 18 qualifying years of service for reserve
retirement purposes, it would be unfair to not allow him to
retire. In view of the above, the Board recommends the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by moving
21 non-active duty retirement points to his anniversary year
ending 11 May 1977, and 22 non-active duty retirement points to
his anniversary year ending 11 May 1978, from the excess over
50 points in qualifying years, to raise the total in the two
non-qualifying years to 50 points.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval. record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Qriscen ) Aroag
ROBERT D. ASALMAN BRIAN J? GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction: of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section

723.6 (e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ieee

Executive Dire

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08512-01

    Original file (08512-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record < enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that three anniversary years are qualifying for reserve retirement. proficiency marks, and was awarded the Organized Reserve Medal, it appears that Petitioner probably attended drills during the period at issue. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06676-05

    Original file (06676-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the end of the approximately 30 year period ending on 30 June 1978 he was credited with about 19 years and 3 months of qualifying service. His retirement point record shows that he was credited with 60 retirement points in the anniversary year ending 30 June 1976, 32 retirement points in the anniversary year ending 30 June 1977, and 60 retirement points in the anniversary year ending 30 June 1978.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01306-08

    Original file (01306-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1306-08 19 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR), filed an application with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06069-01

    Original file (06069-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by transferring 15 reserve retirement points from his anniversary year ending 1990 (62 inactive duty points (60 credited) and 15 active duty points, 75 total points credited) to his anniversary year ending 1989 (35 total points credited), and six reserve retirement points from his anniversary year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010525C070208

    Original file (20040010525C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Infantry (IN) Branch, as a second lieutenant effective 12 May 1969, with an educational delay to obtain a bachelor's degree. The applicant submits a copy of his MRD Computation Sheet that indicates his date of initial appointment as 12 May 1969; total break in service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days; authorized service time as 28 years; date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208

    Original file (2004102698C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00445-07

    Original file (00445-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRGDocket No:445-0723 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged.2. The best way to correct the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR99-13

    Original file (NR99-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, acting as a special board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Vogt, reviewed Subject’s case on 15 February 2013 and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Deputy Commandant of the Marine Corps for Manpower and Reserve Affairs has recommended correcting Subject’s naval-record—as- follows: er (1) Award him career retirement points for each...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR21-13

    Original file (NR21-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (RASL) through his Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) of 1 September 2011 as foliows: {a) Appropriate membership points, (b) 85 non-paid inactive duty points and (c) 21 non-paid active duty points; (2) Remove from his Official Military Personnel File {(OMPF) all documents related to the FY 09 SRB; (3) Update his retirement date to reflect his MRD of 1 September | 2011 and (4) Update his separation code to read voluntary retirement. That Subject's naval record be corrected as follows: (1} Show. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00016-01

    Original file (00016-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Dunn and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the change in his retirement point record. That Petitioner’s naval...