DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
bgCc
Docket No. 3735-11
2 Aug 11
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
ey
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.8.C. 1552
Enct: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HOMC Memo 1050 MPO dt@ 12 Jui 11
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show restoration of annual leave.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and
Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on i August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable atatutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2}, the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action. ,
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 3735-11
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. The member was in a full duty status vice Permissive
Temporary Additional Duty or annual leave for the following periods:
20 Nov 07 to 30 Nov 07 (11)
10 Dec 07 to 25 Dec 07 (16)
29 Dec 07 to 30 Dec 07 (02)
03 Jan 08 to 05 Jan 08 (03)
“19 Jan 08 to 22 Jan 08 (04)
24 Jan 08 to 27 Jan 08 (04)
03 Feb 08 to 03 Feb 08 (01)
O1 Mar 08 to 04 Mar O08 (04)
O07 Mar 68 to 17 Mar O08 {11)
25 Mar 08 to 27 Mar 08 (03)
29 Mar 08 to 06 Apr 08 (09)
24 Apr 08 to 27 Apr 08 (04)
08 May 08 to 14 May 08 (07)
b. Note: As a result of this change, the Petitioner will be
credited with 79 days of leave not taken that were previously charged
to the member's account on or about 6 June 2008.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
[lblinn 4 We
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESSY IIT
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
2 Aug 11 es. - Q
DEAN PFEIFFER
mow. DEAN © Director
S
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00254
The records indicated the applicant received a Record of Individual Counseling for reporting late for duty, a Letter of Reprimand for dereliction of duty, a Letter of Reprimand for failure to pay just debt and an Article 15 for failure to obey and false official statements during a six month period. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 07 Sep 00 for 4 yrs. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00083
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) .------------------------------ .------------------------------ (PE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION I GRADE AMN I RECORDREVIEW X I I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSNISSAN ---------------- r.-..-....-..-.J MEMBER SITTING 1 HON I GEN I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY SUES A95.00 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 I 1 1 2 3 4 I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I I ORDER...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12643-09
12643-09 7 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records oe Secretary of the Navy Subj: i a , REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 2, The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Grover and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00088
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH A ~ C ) 1. For this misconduct you received a Letter of R e p h d , dated 23 Sep 03; f. On 5,6, and 7 May 03, you reported late for duty.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00031
Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. For this misconduct, you received an RIC, dated 21 Mar 03, (Atch 10) (I) You, did, on or about 23 Sep 02, without authority, absent yourself fiom your place of duty at which you were required to be, to wit: 49th Civil Engineering Squadron, located at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, and did remain so absent until on or about 23 Sep 02. You are ordered to...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00258
I'X 781 50-4742 FROM: SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COlJNClL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ' ANOREWS AFB. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Seymour Johnson AFB, NC on 17 Dec 04 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline). You did, at or near Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, between on or about 1 Feb 02 and on or about 22 Mar 02, steal a box of aircraft warning streamers, of a value...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00499
JRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MU 20162.71102 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00499 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPAR'IlfENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE'REVIEW BOARD ---------------------------. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01252-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00022
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH SRA) 1 . (No appeal) (No mitigation) ( 4 ) 02 May 02, Tinker AFB, OK - Article 121. You were given an Article 15 dated 2 May 02, with a reduction to the grade of Airman suspended until 1 Nov 02, after which time it would be remitted without further action, unless sooner vacated.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05064-09
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. However, because the command failed to submit a message withdrawing his recommendation to NPC and NETPDTC, prior to his advancement date, the Petitioner started to receive E-5 pay effective 16 August 2008,...