DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5160
HD:hd
Docket No. 02977-1121
19 August 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: 4 a
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 21 Feb 11 w/attachments
(2) PERS-831 memo dtd 26 Apr 11
(3) CNRFC ltr dtd 1 Aug il
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show that after his disenrollment from the Uniformed
Services University School of Medicine on 13 July 2010, his
reappointment on 14 July 2020 was in the grade of Lieutenant in the
Regular Navy with a date of rank of 14 July 2010 and designator of
1310, rather than in the grade of ensign in the Navy Reserve with
a designator of 1315; and that when he was reappointed in the Navy
Reserve on 24 February 2011, after his discharge from the Regular
Navy, he was reappointed in the grade of lieutenant, designator 1315,
rather than ensign, designator 1315, with a lieutenant date of rank
of 14 July 2010, sothat he will be eligible fora reaffiliation bonus.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August
2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosures (2) and (3), the Navy Personnel Command and
Navy Reserve Forces Command offices with cognizance over the subject
matter of this case have commented to the effect the request has merit
and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the
Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show that his reappointment on 14 July 2010 was in
the grade of lieutenant in the Regular Navy with a date of rank of
14 July 2010 and designator of 1310, rather than in the grade of ensign
in the Navy Reserve with a designator of 1315.
b. That his record be corrected further to show that his
reappointment in the Navy Reserve on 24 February 2011 was in the grade
of lieutenant, designator 1315, rather than ensign, designator 1315,
with a lieutenant date of rank of 14 July 2010; and that his lineal
precedence be adjusted accordingly.
c. That he be granted a reaffiliation bonus on the basis of his
corrected record.
d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that another
copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any
material directed to be removed from Petitioner's record, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Reguiations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ASALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
\o Nas Qu
W. DEAN PFESF
Executive chor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9148 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his promotion to lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2) with a date of rank and effective date of 6 June 2007 (the day after his disenrollment from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS)), and promotion to lieutenant (pay grade O-3) with a date of rank and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04678-02
S HD: hd Docket No: 8 August 2002 04678-02 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LC REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Schultz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 August 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3230 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the grade on his commission of 18 March 2013 in the Medical Service Corps, U. S. Navy as lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2E), rather than ensign (pay grade 0-18). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Ivins and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07778-07
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery commented to the effect that Petitioner is entitled to additional EGC for the period in question, such that the date of rank on his Commission as a lieutenant, Medical Corps, should be changed from 7 June 2007 to 4 May 2006.c. They stated this would allow them to grant Petitioner active duty credit for the period 25 May 2001 to 31 July 2003.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04207-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No. 4207-10 15 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tar Secretary of the Navy AT ic A i IR BT LEO Th A TM, REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (4) 10 Us6
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05092-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve on 1 March 2009, rather than 3 April 2009. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman and Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01876-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as a lieutenant, Medical Corps, Navy Reserve as 30 May 2003, rather than 30 May 2004. . c. That any material or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02636-10
02636-10 30 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: ee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman and Messrs. Garst and Lippelis, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09438-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 and 2007 Reserve Major Selection Boards~ so he will be eligible for current reappointment as an officer in the Marine Corps Reserve. In enclosure (4), CMT recommends removing only one of Petitioner’s failures of selection for promotion,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11249-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 11249-10 20 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: ee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by...