DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JSR
Docket No. 1991-11
28 April 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Te: Secretary of the Navy
NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€. L552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 7 Feb 11
1
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 20 Apr 11 w/enclosure
3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 8 June and 11
July 2005. A copy of the page 11A on which both entries appear
is at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Neuschafer and
Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 28 April 2011, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. The page 11A on which the contested entries appear also
includes uncontested entries.
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner's case has commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION :
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entries dated 8 June and 11 July 2005. This is to be
accomplished by reconstructing the page 11A on which the entries
appear, or completely obliterating the entries so they cannot be
read, rather than merely lining through them.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Poin f Viren
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03933-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 16 October 2008, reflecting assignment of a reenlistment code of “RE-30 [refused orders assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining].” A copy of this entry is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09529-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lib (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 June 2006, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Ivins and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2008, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13
Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5316 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llic) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) °} entry dated 21 March 2011 {copy at Tab A). a reviewed be onér's Bilegations of error and injustice on 25 January 202 a pursuant to its regulations, devermined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05747-11
(a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Storz and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10575-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entries dated 14 and 15 February 2008 with Petitioner’s rebuttal dated 19 February 2008 (copies at Tab B). Aldrich and Trucco and Mr. Boyd, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...