DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WJH
1628-11
2 June 2011
_———
This is in reference to your application for correction of
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC L552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 May 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with the
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps letter 1800 MMSR-5
of 21 April 2011, a copy of which is attached. The Board
also considered your reply to the advisory opinion dated 23
May 2011.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
material error or injustice. In this connection the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. The Board agreed that the points earned
in one anniversary year should not be moved to another
anniversary year. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are
Docket: 1628-11
entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P F
Executive Dixéc
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00433-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by MC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 13 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01628-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy period of unauthorized absence and especially your request for discharge to avoid trial for the offenses. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01628-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2009. your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your late husband's discharge because of the seriousness of his misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5701 13
Jn your case, the Board agreed with the advisory opinions that, because you did not gain and maintain proficiency in the community and for the NEC that you received the bonus, in the Board’s view, recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus was appropriate. After reviewing all the circumstances in your case, in the Board’s view, the decision to recoup the unearned portion of the bonus was just, and the half separation pay you received was properly awarded according the Separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02219-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2000. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 17 May 2000, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05293-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00438-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was on 31 December 2001 offering him the REDUX retired pay system and receive a 2. released...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03611-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was released to member on 26 September 2001 offering him the opportunity to elect the REDUX retired pay system and receive a $30,000 CSB by his 15th anniversary of active duty. The member’s CSB GENADMIN notification messages as well as NAVADMIN 245 01 nd NAVADMIN 344/702 clearly notified him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04092-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04166-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...