DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 13543-10
8 February 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Toe Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD a aay
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/044 of
19 Jan 11
(3) Subject'’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-5/HM2 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer and Exnicios
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
7 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
Docket No. 13543-10
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the September 2008,
Navy-wide advancement examination with the effective date of 16 June
2009, and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2009.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter. , ,
if j
pLhbtcen AP
ROBERT D. Z4SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
8 February 2011 \S
W. DEAN P
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08979-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03235-10
03235-10 13 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter’ referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM2/E5 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4369 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04369-14 16 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Quy Ref: (a) Title 10.U.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00424-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12103-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5240-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06447-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13159-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/ET2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the August 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...