Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12883-10
Original file (12883-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. 12883-10
7 January 2011

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Sub}: a
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 dul o9

Encl: (1) DD Form 149

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of
his record as indicated in enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13
January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

j

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

b. Petitioner's case is within the category of cases covered
by reference {b).

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
in accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board
directs the corrective action indicated below.

As Petitioner's case has not been finalized by the Naval
Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final
rating of 50% or higher for posttraumatic stress disorder is
premature and was not considered by the Board. He may reapply to
the Board after he has exhausted his administrative remedies
within the DES.

RECOMMENDATION ;

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was assigned a disability rating of 50% vice 30% for
posttraumatic stress disorder when his name was placed orf the
Temporary Disability Retired List effective 30 May 2007, and a
combined rating of 60%, provided that such action does not
adversely affect his total compensation, including but not
limited to combat-related special compensation.

b. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval
record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

(ge. ioe

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN HS R. EB
Recorder Acting Re¢order

5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Requlations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby -
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Weed
W. DEAN F

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01141-11

    Original file (01141-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1141-11 11 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 To. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on il February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12889-10

    Original file (12889-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13438-10

    Original file (13438-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11871-10

    Original file (11871-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11871-10 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 7 January 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13441-10

    Original file (13441-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00501-11

    Original file (00501-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13442-10

    Original file (13442-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and imusiee om 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12884-10

    Original file (12884-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10139-10

    Original file (10139-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final rating of 50% for posttraumatic stress disorder is premature and was not considered by the Board. Pursuant to the delegation of Ete set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08562-10

    Original file (08562-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). aS a and Mr. aw reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a...