Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11764-10
Original file (11764-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
4)

y

‘
eM
ty

ey fs
tra” WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN

  
  

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

 
  
   

      

Docket No: 11764-10
9 December 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW_OF NAVAL RECORD ICO pe eee

Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C, 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
active duty enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting the removal of a NAVMC 118 (13)
regarding a summary court-martial (SCM) conviction on 8 December
2008 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. a a °
Mr, QED weviewed Petitioner's a legations of error and

injustice on 7 December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. On 8 December 2008, Petitioner was convicted by SCM of

conspiracy to haze. He was sentenced to a reduction in paygrade,
confinement, and a forfeiture of pay. The sentence was approved
on 8 December 2008. However, with his application, he submits a

supplemental convening authority action dated 8 January 2009,
stating that the actions taken on 8 December 2008 were withdrawn.
Further, that the findings of guilty and the sentence were
disapproved, and that his rank, rights, and privileges wer
restored.
c. An advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters Marine
Corps, dated 23 November 2010, States, in part, that im order to
justify correction of a military or naval record, Petitioner
bears the burden to show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it
must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the alleged entry or
omission in the record was in error or unjust. In this case, the
advisory states, in part, that he has met the burden for relief.
The convening authority chose to disapprove the findings and
sentence. As a result, the SCM became a nullity and has had no
effect on his career progression as indicated by his promotion to
sergeant in 2010. Finally, ther@is no legat’ justificatién for
maintginings thes NAVMC 118 (13) reporting the SCM conviction or
supplemental convening authority’s action in this OMPF.

CONCLUSION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the advisory opinion from Headquarters
Marine Corps, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request
warrants favorable action in the form of relief.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's NAVMC 118 (13) and
supplemental convening authority’s action dated 8 January 2009,
regarding the SCM conviction on 8 December 2008, be removed from

his OMPF. Ce owe PF gar ppt
In view af the above, the Board recommends the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's NAVMC 118 (13) regarding the SCM
conviction on 8 December 2008 and supplemental convening
authority's action letter dated 8 January 2009, be removed from
his official record, along with all associated documentation.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material direct to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to this Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Sear) Hog
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRIAN JY GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

be) WLam!

W. DEAN PFE ]
Executive Direc

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016160

    Original file (20140016160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests a summary court-martial from a different service (U.S. Marine Corps (USMC)) be removed from the performance folder of his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted folder. An NAVMC Form 118(13), dated 17 July 1996, shows he was convicted by a summary court-martial of unauthorized absence and was sentenced to a forfeiture of pay for one month and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04078-00

    Original file (04078-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    action occurred on 30 June 1987 since administrative separation action was initiated on that same day due to your disciplinary actions, and other than the NJP of that day, the most recent such action was in January 1987, Additionally, it seems clear that some sort of disciplinary more than five months earlier. Point of contact is Mr. NAVMC re&est for removal 118(12) page 12 entries Director Manpower Management Information Systems Division 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01

    Original file (03973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | nr6541 14

    Original file (nr6541 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An advisory opinion from HQMC states, in part, that Marine Corps regulations instructs that Page 11 entries concerning administrative discharge proceedings shall not be made if the proceedings do not, upon final review, result in discharge, and that all Page 11 entries related to wrongful drug use should be removed from Petitioner’s OMPF. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 118(11) entries related to wrongful drug use from his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06881-99

    Original file (06881-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They were unable to find how, if at all, his report influenced your nonjudicial punishment or your removal from the 1998 staff sergeant selection list, nor could they find how he changed his opinions following the review of his report by the CO. We reviewed Sergeant documents concerning his Administrative Remarks page 11 entries dated 980804 and 981125, Offenses and Punishment page 12 entry dated 990311 and CMC letter 1450/3 MMPR-2 dated 2. In view of the above, it is recommended...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03156-01

    Original file (03156-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You also made new requests to remove your relief for cause from recruiting duty, which was requested on 5 April 1999; your nonjudicial punishment of 29 March 1999; and your service record page 11 counseling entries dated 17 and 24 February 1999. We are asked to provide an advisory opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his Service Record Book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all references to his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 29 March 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05553-01

    Original file (05553-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith and Zsalman and Ms. Leblanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 28 May 1998. Correction of Naval Records approve Staff request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018028

    Original file (20140018028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued for this period of service shows the effective date of his promotion to CPL as 1 June 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * moving the DD Form 369, dated 6 January 2009, and the attached page 11 of NAVMC Form 118(13) from the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04998-00

    Original file (04998-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 161 0 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF STAFF USMC SERGEAN (a) (b) SSgt. VIRGINIA 22134-5103 NAVY IN REPLY REFER TO: 107 0 .MI MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08720-00

    Original file (08720-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing a service record page 11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 31 July 1992. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 31 July 1992. corrective action by this Headquarters...