DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGT 20370-5
A SSS) 6 heget Me, LiFe 10
25 October 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (te) ©O D,8.e. L552
(bo) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 Jul 09
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of
his record as indicated in enclosure (1).
2. The Board, consisting of Mses and Sia and Mr.
Qui -eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 21 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
b. Petitioner’s case is within the category of cases covered
by reference (b).
CONCLUSTON :
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
in accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board
directs the corrective action indicated below.
The Board did not consider correcting the final disability
rating of 60% which you received when you were permanently
retired by reason of physical disability, as it is beyond the
scope of this review. If you believe you are entitled to a
higher final disability rating, you should submit a new
application correction of your naval record, which will be
processed in accordance with standard rather than expedited
Board procedures.
RECOMMENDATION :
Wait
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was assigned a disability rating of 50% for posttraumatic
stress disorder when his name was placed on the Temporary
Disability Retired List effective 31 July 2005, vice the rating
of 30% for that condition which he actually received on that
date, and a combined rating of 70% vice 60%, provided that such
action does not adversely affect his total compensation,
including but not limited to combat-related special
compensation.
b. That no further relief be granted.
ec. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval
wecord.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled Maer,
wes JE
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JAMES R. EXNICIOS
Recorder /Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Ls. Sao Meal
W. DEAN PF
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10145-10
10145-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS; Secretary of the Navy Subj ps a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs _eueet Gu anc qua reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11042-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of vs, SEEEMes cd Messrs. Cn and viewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11212-10
11212-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL REC Ref: (a) 10 U.SsC. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10761-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). If you believe you are entitled to a higher final disability rating, you should submit a new application correction of your naval record, which will be processed in accordance with standard rather than expedited Board procedures. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12888-10
12888-10 22 December 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tet Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. a odieaal wm reviewed Petitioner's allegations of ustice on December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board £ of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10142-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). If you believe you are entitled to a higher final disability rating, you should submit a new application correction of your naval record, which will be processed in accordance with standard rather than expedited Board procedures. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13441-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12884-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13442-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and imusiee om 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00501-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...