Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11163-10
Original file (11163-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 11163-10
21 Dec 10

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL peut ie ew
Ref: (a) ‘Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Fncl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/10U0768 of 2 Nov 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to establish entitlement to Sea Duty Incentive Pay (SDIP).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21
December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 11163-10

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He is entitled to SDIP for the period August 2010 to July
2013 (36 months), at the rate of $750.00 per month, for a lump-sum
total of $27,000.

b. Prior to receiving the SDIP entitlement Petitioner must
execute a Page-13, as required by Policy Decision Memorandum (PDM)
006-07, and forward same to the Navy Personnel Command (PERS-40DD) .
NOTE: The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) will not make
payment of the entitlement until notified by PERS-40DD that the Page-
13 agreement has been received.

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary @f the
Navy.

21 December 2010 Lo ane

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00016-08

    Original file (00016-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, ‘and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. On 31 December 2008 Petitioner applied to the Board to correct his record to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6581 14

    Original file (NR6581 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. PERS-40DD, your SDIP request was approved 20 November 2013 but the message was not released until Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2737 14

    Original file (NR2737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sse Sileavewe= issued orders on 25 September 2013 to the USS HARRY S. TRUMAN before having received an approval for SDIP from Navy Personnel Command (NPC) .° c. On 25 November 2013 Petitioner applied to the Board to titlement to SDIP-B claiming -eve that the SDIP reguest would be approved per reference (b), and the orders released in September after my SDIP-B request approval.” See enclosure (1). These additional documents, however, failed to take Ato consideration the 4-6 months short of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03409-08

    Original file (03409-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5936 14

    Original file (NR5936 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner claims that “ I reviewed the message about SDIP and found that I still qualify since I am not getting paid (Frocked) for E-6 and because of my promotion I can fulfill my orders and complete the minimum requirement of 24 months to be able to receive SDIP.” However, enclosure (1) is the only documentary evidence Petitioner submitted to support his claim of why he felt he was eligible for the SDIP. By the time Petitioner’s HYT was approved and he found out his HYT would only have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10540-10

    Original file (10540-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 10540-10 21 April 2613 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) TIitlé 10 Us8se. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10988-09

    Original file (10988-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10772-10

    Original file (10772-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01766-10

    Original file (01766-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 29 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hess and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06823-10

    Original file (06823-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (a) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 19 September 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, and the five Entrance National Agency Check (ENTNAC) documents in the Service-Contract folder of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), images...