DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No. 06823-10
8 November 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tox Secretary of the Navy
TEW OF NAVAL RECORD;
Ref: (a) 20 0.8.0. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Jun 10 w/attachment
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 21 Oct 10 w/enclosure
(3) HOMC MIO memo dtd 22 Jul 10
(4) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application,
enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (a)
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 19 September 2005, a
copy of which is at Tab A, and the five Entrance National Agency Check
(ENTNAC) documents in the Service-Contract folder of his Official
Military Personnel File (OMPF), images 23 through 27. As shown in
enclosure (2), Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) has removed the
ENTNAC documents from his OMPF.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Chapman and
Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
4 November 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (3), the HOMC office with cognizance over
the subject matter of Petitioner's request to remove the page
11(a) entry has commented to the effect that this request has
merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an
error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11(a) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 19 September 2005. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11(a) on which the entry appears,
or completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read,
rather than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Bropstias ff len
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
eS fe
eo WW. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07
He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07838-10
JAMS stated that the NUP “stemmed from [Petitioner’s] failure to report a civilian DUI arrest,” however, the UPB entry actually says he was punished “for failing to notify his command of his DUI conviction [emphasis added] .” JAM5 noted that “the requirement to report the conviction (rather than the arrest) is lawful.” d. Enclosure (4) explains that PERB directed removing the contested fitness report in light of enclosure (3). e. In enclosure (5), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command (MCRC)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9043 13
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), MIO, the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case, has commented to the effect that the request warrants partial relief, specifically, modification of the contested entry to remove “,which resulted in you being relieved for cause”. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10575-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entries dated 14 and 15 February 2008 with Petitioner’s rebuttal dated 19 February 2008 (copies at Tab B). Aldrich and Trucco and Mr. Boyd, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...