DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
RDZ:ecb
Docket No. 10300-10
3 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2
February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion, from
Headquarters Marine Corps dated 20 September 2010, a copy of which
is attached. The Board also carefully reviewed the decision of the
Navy Discharge Review Board rendered in February of 2008 a copy of
which is also enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion and the findings and conclusions
set forth in the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
regretted theoarbirercareumbsanresvefremarpscase are such that
pig able action cannot be taléetAvY ANdEXare entitled to have the Board
megPonsider its decision WPSHNSGRPS ACGh°Sf Rew and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
é Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07018-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2011. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 20 August 2010 and 14 March 2011, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13694-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05470-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 5 July 2011 with attachments and the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 July 2011, 8 August 2011 and 10 August 2011 with attachment, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07109-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2011. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals, letter, of 1 February 2011, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13813-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/045 of 19 Jan 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12576-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/041 of 19 Jan 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11753-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10284-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09942-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. The Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/559 of 22 Oct 10, and NPC memo 7220 PERS-835 of 12 Jan 11, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00447-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.