DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
‘ 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 9255-10
1 November 2010
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
From:
To: Secretary of the Navy
NAVAL
Ref: fa) Title 10 uU.6.¢0. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reason for his discharge and reentry code.
2. The Board, consisting of - ed and Ms.
, reviewed Petitioner's allegatio £ er njustice
October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policiés..
eviewed all the facts of record pertaining
3. The Board, having r
f error and injustice, finds as
to: Petitioner's allegations o
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 28 October 1998.
Petitioner did not have any disciplinary action during his period
of service.
c. A psychological evaluation conducted on 24 November 1998
found that Petitioner had an attention deficit/hyperactivity
disorder. He was thought to present a risk of harm to himself
and others if retained in the Navy. On 3 December 1998 he
received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous entry
and was assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
d. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of either
an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for the
above reason.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board concludes that the reentry code of RE-3E
should be assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had
any disciplinary infractions during his period of service and his
record does not otherwise support the more stigmatizing code of
RE-4.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on
3 December 1998, he was assigned an RE-3E reentry code instead of
the RE-4 reentry code actually assigned on that date.
b. That no further relief be granted.
c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in his
naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) itjis certifiedithat a “quorum was
presept at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
Foregding is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
(fre
ROBERT D. ASALMAN JAMES R. EXNICIOS
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
TD, Him
FOr, W. DEAN IFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04233-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON.DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4233-10 21 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORM>R Qi qe 2eviey oF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 18 March 2010. ; mpm reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09855-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8955-10 27 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Lo; Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER GS NAVAL RECORD REVIEW OF —— Seen Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was assigned on 18...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02731-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 2731-03 12 September 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01905-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS NAVY ANNEX e JRE WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 1) et No. 1905-10 25 March 20106 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: FORMER SR,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06462-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6462-03 12 September 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reentry code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09033-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reentry code of RE-1 vice RE-4. The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01852-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1852-11 1 April, 2074 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj ] , a REVIEW OF NAVAL Ref: (a) Title 10 U.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code. The Board, consisting of Mr. Butherus, Ms. Henkel, and Ms. Countryman,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05760-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code to RE-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Midboe, Storz, and Blanchard, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 12 July 1991.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12993-10
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 18 July 2008. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Garst, and Mr. Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09343-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 16 June 2009. 2 a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative,...