Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09149-10
Original file (09149-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 09149-10
6 June 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tes Secretary of the Navy

Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO mas

Ref: (a) Title 10 u.S.c. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) memo 1600 RCT of
10 May 11

(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was
entitled to full separation pay at the time of separation from
active duty service.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner was released from active duty on 2 August
2010, after serving 8 years, 1 month, and 9 days of active duty
service due to his non-selection for promotion to staff sergeant
while serving in the active reserves program.
Docket: 09149-10

c. Petitioner received an honorable discharge and was
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1A. Under Marine Corps Order
(MCO) 1040.31 he was eligible for full separation pay prior to
his discharge from active duty service. However, a request for
separation pay determination was never officially submitted to
Headquarters Marine Corps.

d. In August 2010, Petitioner submitted an application with
this Board seeking full separation pay.

e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over USMC separation pay has commented to the
effect that the request for full separation pay has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
to show that:

a. Petitioner is entitled to full separation pay for his
release from active duty on 2 August 2010, based on the years of
active service actually completed.

b. Petitioner’s separation code is changed to reflect
“JGH1” vice “MBK4”.

c. Petitioner’s narrative reason for separation is changed
to reflect “Involuntary Discharge (No Board) Completion of
Active Service” vice “Completion of Required Active Service”.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6 (c) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
Docket: 09149-10

foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

[Leben ANC

 

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS;
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

6 June 2011

encase PD, of te Nicaea

Ta_W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01364-11

    Original file (01364-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to full separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13298-10

    Original file (13298-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10540-10

    Original file (10540-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket: 10540-10 21 April 2613 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) TIitlé 10 Us8se. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00907-11

    Original file (00907-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12067-10

    Original file (12067-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 se Lorry Yes \| }/ LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was transferred to the Retired Reserve List (Awaiting pay at age 60) vice being discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve. The Board, consisting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11994-10

    Original file (11994-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at “with dependents” rate from 17 July 2010 to 17 September 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09760-10

    Original file (09760-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Perris < eT) : LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve (Awaiting Pay at Age 60) vice discharged from the United States Marine Corps Reserve. CONCLUSION Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05173-11

    Original file (05173-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his date of rank to staff sergeant be adjusted to 1 November 2006. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13759-10

    Original file (13759-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to separation pay when he was discharged from the Marine Corps 14 October 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06329-10

    Original file (06329-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve (Awaiting Pay at Age 60) vice discharged from the United States Marine Corps Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2011 and, pursuant to its...