Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08701-10
Original file (08701-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 08701-10
2 June 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Te: Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance
(N135C) of 16 Dec 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that she made a claim for

Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity payments within six years
following the death of her husband, :

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

23 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Subject transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List
on 1 September 1974. At the time, he was married to pal
a7 and was auto enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with
maximum spouse and child coverage.

c. Subject died on 2 March 1976. Petitioner alleges that she
submitted a claim for an SBP annuity and received payment from March
1976 to September 1979, when she remarried and was therefore,
ineligible to continue to receive an SBP annuity. Although, the
Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) has no record of Petitioner
submitting an SBP claim, or receiving an annuity, they do have a
record of the minor child enum receiving SBP annuity payments
from 1979 until the age of majority in 1993.

da. Petitioner divorced her second husband in April 1986. a?!
QQMMMME was still maintained as the SBP annuitant.

e. Petitioner remarried her third husband in June 1986, and was
divorced in September 2009.

£. In 2009, after Petitioner’s divorce, she initiated a claim to
DFAS to restart her SBP annuity since she was now single. DFAS denied
the claim based on the fact that there was not enough information or
evidence to prove that Petitioner submitted a claim back in March
1976, upon Subject’s death.

g. In August 2010, Petitioner submitted a claim with the Board
for Correction of Naval Records to restart her SBP annuity since she
claims that she is now eligible and that she submitted an initial

claim within six years of her first husband’ s Qe

death.

h. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective

RECOMMENDATION:

That Subject’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner made a timely written claim for Survivor Benefit
Plan annuity payments to DFAS within one day of her husband's ea
death.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

NOTE: Petitioner is currently receiving disability indemnity
compensation (DIC).

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

Matter.
ybO

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS,“ IIL

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured

compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

2 June 2011 “1S AD ea

Fee_wW. DEAN PFTEFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012118

    Original file (20100012118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, their final judgment decree granted her coverage under the SBP as a former spouse and the FSM's election is incorporated in that order. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP coverage for spouse and children prior to his retirement. In the absence of evidence that the FSM elected former spouse coverage under the SBP there is no basis to now designate the applicant as the recipient of said benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006545C070205

    Original file (20060006545C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM elected SBP coverage for spouse and child on 21 September 1972 and stopped paying SBP spouse costs when his first spouse died in November 1976. The evidence of record also indicates that the FSM did not notify the Retired Pay Branch that he had remarried and that he did not pay any SBP costs from 1 January 1979 through 10 December 2002, the date of the FSM's death. In fact, the applicant received SBP payments over the course of more than three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007646

    Original file (20120007646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028877

    Original file (20100028877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence that shows he changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce, and there is no indication the applicant requested the SBP coverage be deemed to her as a former spouse. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017236

    Original file (20100017236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity and life insurance policy. The FSM's records at DFAS show the FSM married Dawana on 16 December 1995. Therefore, in the event of the FSM's death, any SBP benefits would have to be paid to the beneficiary in effect at the time of death, his spouse, not his former spouse, if they had been married for at least...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004116

    Original file (20070004116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) dated 13 November 1979 which shows the deceased retiree elected spouse only SBP coverage. The divorce decree did not award the SBP to the applicant nor did the applicant provide a deemed election to DFAS within one year from the date of divorce. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011766

    Original file (20130011766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel provides copies of the following documents: * FSM's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points * FSM's Death Certificate * Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage * Mediation Agreement * 20-year letter * email messages, dated March 2013 * Military Pension Division Order * former attorney's letter to DFAS, dated 28 December 2009 * extract of DODFMR 7000.14-R * HRC letter, dated 19 January 2012 * applicant's Application for Survivor Annuity, dated 30 January 2012 * HRC letter,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11995-08

    Original file (11995-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable ‘naval record be corrected to show that after his divorce from eile December 2006, Subject submitted a written request changing his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary election from “spouse” to “former spouse.” 2. & 1450(£) (3) to change the 1 Under the rules governing SBP, when a person with suspended...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657

    Original file (BC-2005-02657.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...