DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 07569-10
7 October 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction to your
naval record to (a) show that as of 29 November 2007, your
former spouse was removed as a beneficiary of your RCSBP and. (b)
to name your nephew, xg as a beneficiary of your
RCSBP.
Your records have been administratively corrected to remove your
former spouse as a beneficiary. This administrative action
Satisfies part (a) of your request.
Regarding the part of your request pertaining to adding your
nephew as a beneficiary, the following information is provided:
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 September 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HOQMC memo 1600 MMSR-5 of 30 Aug
10, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board agreed with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive tor
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11104-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10316-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. When received his NOE he was unmarried and had no eligible beneficiary for participation in the RCSBP andremarried on 15 October 2005.c. As previously stated, was unmarried when he received his NOE and is divorce decree contained no provision requiring him to provide former spouse RCSBP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13431-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existerice of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03815-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07993-02
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. His RCSBP child began receiving retired pay on 18 April 1984. coverage became SBP child coverage on that date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07253-10
Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any change to your husband’s RCSBP election. Under this option, if the retiree dies before reaching age 60, a survivor annuity is payable on the date the member would have attained age 60. Option C - Immediate annuity.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06758-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. It was amended and d. A member who was eligible for retired pay under United States Code, Chapter 1223, on 30 September or who received by 30 June Title 10, 1978, but who was under age 60, 1979, a notification of...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-186
Although CWO4 T did not elect the applicant as a former spouse beneficiary after their divorce, the applicant claims that she is entitled to RCSBP payments under CWO4 T’s 1992 original election certificate for spousal coverage because the guidance provided to CWO4 T and her at the time of his election did not require him to take any further action to keep her as his beneficiary if they divorced. Nor is the applicant a former spouse beneficiary under CWO4 T’s RCSBP. Nor is she a former...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003096
The evidence in the FSM's file, and provided by the applicant indicates the FSM was divorced at the time he completed his SBP election form in 1997. In order to provide immediate coverage to the applicant or his nephew the FSM would have had to so indicate on his election form. Unfortunately, the evidence does not support a conclusion that the FSM intended to provide an immediate annuity to an insurable interest under the SBP when he made his SBP election in November 1998.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02611-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2012, the applicants counsel submitted a request for reconsideration based on their submission of affidavits from the applicants former husband (member) and his current spouse agreeing to the requested relief and voluntarily relinquishing all rights and/or benefits under the members pre- and post-retirement...