DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
a me
Sy as ae
o
TJR
Docket No: 6704-10
14 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 April 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies -
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
im justice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 18 June 1990 at age 17 and began a
four-year period of active duty on 11 June 1991. You served
without disciplinary incident and on 16 March 1993 you were
advanced to paygrade E-4.
Your record contains an adverse performance evaluation for the
period from 8 June 1993 to 30 June 1994 which reflects, in part,
that you were not recommended for advancement or retention. It
also contains a separation performance evaluation for the period
from 1 July 1994 to 10 June 1995 which also reflects you were not
recommended for retention or reenlistment. It further contains
an administrative remarks entry, which you signed/acknowledged
that reflects, in part, that you were not eligible for
reenlistment due to “not having been recommended for
reenlistment" by your command.
On 10 June 1995, upon completion of a four year period of
required active service, you were honorably released and
transferred to the Navy Reserve from active duty. At that time
you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. On 17 June 1998 you were
honorably discharged at the expiration of your enlistment.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, overall;satisfactory record, and desire to change
your reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
reenlistment code because of your ineligibility and
nonrecommendation for reenlistment which are sufficient to
support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code, and are
authorized by regulatory guidance. Accordingly, your application
has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
lp Dea’ :
W. DEAN Sed
Executive Divestor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07476-01
Punishment imposed consisted of a suspended On 25 April 1995 you were notified that administrative separation action was being initiated to discharge you under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. present your case to an administrative discharge board You appeared before an ADB with counsel on 14 August 1995. The found you had committed misconduct due to ADB, by a vote of 3-0, a pattern of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01949-01
On 16 October 1995 you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. You did not provide the second page You were not An RE-3B means the individual was discharged for Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of pregnancy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05569-01
At that time you were assigned an RR-4 You state in your application that since discharge you have attended weight management and nutrition courses and are now within weight standards. Finally, the Board noted the adverse marks in two categories in the last performance evaluation and The Board that you were not recommended for advancement. believed that despite the excellent comments concerning your performance of duty, the adverse marks and comments meant that a recommendation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00979-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 December 1994, you were advised that your commanding officer was recommending you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an andividual is discharged for misconduct and is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05872-01
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 5 November 1993 for three years as a PNSN (E-3). At the time of your separation, E-4 was 10 years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02160-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board was aware that an RE-4 reenlisted code is the only authorized code when an individual is discharged because they are a conscientious objector. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01169-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05148-02
of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1994 you were diagnosed On 29 On 5 January 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07822-00
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of your financial affairs, been involved in two incidents of The reporting senior noted that during this period Your performance as an EW2 However, the domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness test. discharged on 24 March 2000 with an You were not recommended for retention and were honorably RX-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...