DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Docket No. 6492-10
14 April 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tor Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 Us6.c. 1552
(b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 Jul 09
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (aj), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his
record as indicated in enclosure (1).
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Gorenflo and McBride
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 April
2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:
a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
b. Petitioner’s case is within the category of cases covered by
reference (b).
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and in
accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board directs
the corrective action indicated below.
The Board did not consider the request for permanent disability
rating of 50% or higher effective on the date of his permanent
retirement, as that issue it is beyond the scope of this review. If
Petitioner believes he is entitled to a higher final disability
rating, he should submit a new application correction of his naval
record, which will be processed in accordance with standard rather
than expedited Board procedures.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on
29 November 2005, when his name was placed on the Temporary Disability
Retired List, he was assigned a disability rating for postt¥aumatic
stress disorder of 50% vice 10%, and a combined rating of 70% vice
40%, provided that such action does not adversely affect his total
compensation, including but not limited to combat-related special
compensation.
b. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
JAMES R. EXNICIOS
Acting Recorder
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e) ) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
Wu Ql
W. DEAN PF FAR
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13439-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. If Petitioner believes he is entitled to a higher final disability...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12882-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. If Petitioner believes she is entitled to a higher final disability...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02708-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Gorenflo and McBride reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06758-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). If Petitioner believes she is entitled to a higher final disability rating, she should submit a new application correction of her naval record, which will be processed in accordance with standard rather than expedited Board procedures. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11871-10
11871-10 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 7 January 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the delegation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10761-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). If you believe you are entitled to a higher final disability rating, you should submit a new application correction of your naval record, which will be processed in accordance with standard rather than expedited Board procedures. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01141-11
1141-11 11 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 To. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on il February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12889-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13438-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13441-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...