Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06470-10
Original file (06470-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

RDZ: ecb
Docket No. 06470-10
22 July 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
ros Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF figs? pie

 

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.ic., 1552
Enel: (1) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
applied to this Board requesting that the other than honorable
discharge (OTH) issued to him on 6 June 1997 be upgraded.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs Geberth, LaCroix and
Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 21 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner's application to the Board was filed in a timely
manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 August 1993
for a term of four years. During nearly three and one half
years of service he had no disciplinary infractions and
performed his military duties in a superior manner which
resulted in his promotion to corporal. Unfortunately in
February of 1997 Petitioner received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for illegally using steroids that he ingested as a part of
weightlifting regimen to increase his physical strength, which
he believed would increase his effectiveness in combat.
Nevertheless due to the Marine Corps’ zero tolerance policy
regarding illegal drug usage Petitioner received an OTH on 6
June 1997 after having served three years, nine months and 12
days on a four year enlistment.

d. Since his discharge Petitioner has conducted himself ina
commendable manner. Married and the father of two children he
has earned an associate’s degree in audio engineering and is
presently employed as arm audio technician in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attached
to his application is a letter from the Court Administrator
attesting to Petitioner’s technical skills and outstanding
character.

>

CONCLUSION :

Although the Board can find no error or injustice in the
issuance of an OTH in June of 1997 it concluded that the
interests of justice would be better served by upgrading
Petitioner's discharge to general under honorable conditions.
This recommendation is in the nature of clemency and is based in
large part on the following factors. First of all the Board
takes into account his excellent service during his first three
and one half years of service. Secondly there is the nature of
the drug used and Petitioner’s purpose in using it. Thirdly he
was less than three months short of completing a four year
enlistment when he was discharged. And finally there is the
matter of Petitioner’s post service conduct and accomplishments
which the Board finds especially noteworthy.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's record be corrected to show that he was
issued a general discharge under honorable conditions on 6 June
1997 vice an other than honorable discharge.

b. That upon request the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner’s application to the Board was received
on 15 June 2010.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s record so that future reviewers will have a clear
understanding of the nature of the Board’s action as well as its
reasons for this corrective action.

4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. Le BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

 

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
bSSoxsé
W. DE PF

Executive ctor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00044-10

    Original file (00044-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that the other than honorable discharge (OTH) issued to him on 10 February 2006 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Messrs Exnicios, George and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board's recommendation is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06776-10

    Original file (06776-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs George, Pfeiffer and Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reasons for the Board’s action. That Petitioner's discharge of 6...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09597-10

    Original file (09597-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    09597-10 25 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF pe? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that the other than honorable discharge (OTH) and RE-4 reenlistment code issued to him on 21 December 2006 be changed. After his second nonjudicial punishment Petitioner was referred to an alcohol abuse program for treatment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04183-09

    Original file (04183-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SON Docket No: 041383-09 22 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy AVAL RECORD oF

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13634-10

    Original file (13634-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    13634-10 21 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Der Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ec enl/ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs Exnicios, George and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03487-09

    Original file (03487-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 03487-09 20 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a , former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH) characterization of his discharge be changed....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06397-08

    Original file (06397-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    { DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket Neo: 06397-08 6 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Siena REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Tile 10 U.S.C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. e. In June 2008, Petitioner submitted a request to this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03187-12

    Original file (03187-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7001S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his other than honorable (OTH) discharge, that was issued on 25 August 1970, to a general characterization of service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Lippolis and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2013...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00812-10

    Original file (00812-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TAL Docket No: 812-10 26 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records eis Secretary of the Navy Ref: ( 10 U,8 Oe and Mr. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Reference (b) sets forth the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07711-99

    Original file (07711-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The hearing panel found him unfit for continued naval service, and recommended that he be separated with a 10% rating under VA code 5295. It concludes that the PEB hearing panel gave too much weight to the statement of Dr. , which reflects substantially different In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action; however, as Petitioner ’s condition was subject to improvement at the time of his separation from the Navy, permanent retirement...