Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04183-09
Original file (04183-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SON
Docket No: 041383-09
22 March 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

AVAL RECORD oF 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10064-07

    Original file (10064-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 10064-07 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF(gne Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. On 9 July 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. g. Regulations authorize an OTH discharge to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01075 12

    Original file (01075 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 01075-12 3 December 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOY Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD lr Ber: {a} LO U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Storz and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02156-08

    Original file (02156-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 2156-08 27 October 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF =i Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Apparently, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1037 13

    Original file (NR1037 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of. His case was forwarded recommending that he be discharged under other than honorable (OTH) conditions. ,Petitioner’s request doe The-minority-member notes that Petitioner was separated for misconduct due to a commission of a serious offence.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2510-13

    Original file (NR2510-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2014. You were "80 discharged .On 29 October 1992. , Ce The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially’ mitigating factors, such as your record of service, post service accomplishments, character letters, and desire to upgrade your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04475-08

    Original file (04475-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 4475-08 6 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. On 11 August 1988, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1978-13

    Original file (NR1978-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade-oef his other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service and removal of his 1 August 1980 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Dixit, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01894-09

    Original file (01894-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 April 1993, administrative discharge action was initiated by.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02189-00

    Original file (02189-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service then the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 26 January 1993. On that date he received nonjudicial punishment On 25 November 1992 he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11224-10

    Original file (11224-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Storz, and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore the Board concludes that as a matter of clemency, a general discharge is more appropriate than the OTH discharge now of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...