Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06061-10
Original file (06061-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 6061-10
4 Oct 10

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice in
regards to enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. The
Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) system indicates you declined
enrollment in the MGIB program. However, even if you had properly
enrolled, to include paying the required $1,200 contribution, there is
no action the Board can take as the delimiting date has passed.
Individuals have 10 years from the date of separation from active duty
to use MGIB entitlement. Since you were separated on 4 September
1997, your delimiting date has already passed. The MGIB program is
administered by the Veteran’s Administration (VA) and the Board has no
authority to extend the delimiting date. Accordingly, your request
for enrollment in the MGIB has been denied. The request to have your
middle name corrected on your DD Form 214 has been administratively
resolved and a DD Form 215 has been issued. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. 6061-10

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05172-98

    Original file (05172-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. To have been eligible,- been on active duty and a participant in VEAP on 9 Oct 96.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02889-02

    Original file (02889-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 S JLP: ddj Docket No: 2889-02 20 August 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03604-07

    Original file (03604-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 5 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (c), members who initially entered active duty after 30 June 1985 and immediately enrolled in the MGIB Program, are eligible to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06715-06

    Original file (06715-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6715-06 4 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00510-06

    Original file (00510-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    510-06 10 May 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06291-03

    Original file (06291-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10045-06

    Original file (10045-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10045-06 7 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10578-07

    Original file (10578-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10578-07 22 Jan 08 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your nava1 record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2008. Unless a member brings the MGIB pay problem to the attention of their military pay office, it will go unresolved, either deducting money when the member declined MGIB enrollment or not deducting money when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05018-08

    Original file (05018-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5018-08 25 Aug 08 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2008. Recommend denial Of Pay request to enroll in th Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) P¥ogram.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05582-08

    Original file (05582-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS-262G of 21 Jul 08, a copy of which is attached. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll from the MGIB Program is irrevocable.