DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 05600-10
28 March 2011
plication for correction of your naval
f title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March
2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
dance with administrative regulations and procedures
the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
he Board consisted of your application, together with
your naval record and
accor
applicable to
considered by t
all material submitted jn support thereof,
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious c
the Board found that the evi
establish the existence of probable mater
tive duty in the Navy From 28 December 1962 to 28
You served on ac
leased from active duty and
December 1966, when you were re
transferred to the Naval Reserve. You were not eligible for
to pay grade E-4 on the latter date because you had
unishment on 22 December 1966, and were reduced
to pay grade E-2. On 8 October 2008 the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) denied your request for service connection and disability
compensation for burns and a hernia. Although the VA acknowledged
that you had sustained burns and undergone a hernia operation while
you were on active duty in the Navy, Lt denied your request for service
connection for those conditions because neither was symptomatic in
2008.
advancement
received nonjudicial p
In view of the foregoing, and as you have not demonstrated that you
were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of
your release from active duty, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
ror other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
Fregard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
fegularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
x
Sincerely,
Ww)
W. DEAN PFEDFRAR
Executive D tor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04901-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2011. Your receipt of disability ratings from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA assigned those ratings without regard to the issue of your fitness for naval service as of 28 October 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11019-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were discharged from the Navy by reason of physical disability on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02433-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. The VA granted you a disability rating of 10% for a hiatal hernia with psychophysiological gastrointestinal disorder, history of peptic ulcer, history of cholecystectomy; and a separate 10% rating for migraine headaches. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13827-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 29 December 2003 to 28 December 2007, when you were voluntarily released from active duty at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03232-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were not discharged because of the effects of a recurrent hernia, as you now allege, but because of the effect of recurrent bilateral varicocele. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05427-06
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and Policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 December 2002 you were found physically qualified for enlistment in the Navy. However, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06289-05
Documentary material considered by he Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were released from active duty and transferred to the Temporary Disability...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11339-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02440-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you underwent a pre-commissioning physical examination on 12 December 2000, at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05707-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. The mititary => departments may assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.