DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
REC
Docket No: 05238-10
3 March 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 March 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
13 April 2010, at age 20. On 19 April 2010, you were referred to
a mental health evaluation and diagnosed with cannabis dependence
in full sustained remission, and a schizotypal personality
disorder. You were counseled regarding your condition, and
advised to seek treatment after separation. Based on the mental
health evaluation, and the fact that you failed to disclose your
previous use of marijuana from age 14 through 17, and the fantasy
you had of killing a co-worker with a knife, you were processed
for separation by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.
After you were advised of your rights, you elected to receive
copies of documents to be forwarded to the separation authority,
but waived all your other procedural rights. Subsequently, on 30
April 2010, you were discharged with an uncharacterized entry
level separation by reason of your diagnosed personality
disorder. At that time, you were assigned a reentry code of
RE-4.
In its review of your application, the Board considered all
mitigating factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board
found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your
reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. The
Board noted that applicable regulations authorize an
uncharacterized discharge for individuals who fail to complete
recruit training. The Board thus concluded that there is no
error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly
assigned under your circumstances. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ww. D
EAN PFEVRF
Executive Divec
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08338-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04400-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly asSigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05249-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were diagnosed with a depressive disorder and recommended for an uncharacterized entry level separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09039-10
Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which were correctly assigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03855-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10206-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2011. However, the Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code and reason for separation should not be changed due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder and failure to complete recruit training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03866-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 26 January 2011. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your narrative reason for separation, or reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder which precluded you from successfully completing recruit training. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05525-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04482-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03097-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. The Board noted that applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are é separated due to personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.