DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX ,
REC
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 0 °
"9 Macket Wo: 03855-1060
4 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 February 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted SE
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
imjustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
29 July 1996, at age 23. On 15 October 1996, you were referred
to a mental health evaluation which was conducted and you were
diagnosed with cyclothymic disorder (a mild form of bipolar)
disorder. You were counseled regarding your condition, and
advised to seek treatment after separation. Based on the mental
health evaluation, and the fact that you failed to disclose your
previous counseling and medication that you were taking prior to
enlisting in the Navy, you were processed for separation by
reason of a diagnosed personality disorder, and the fact that you
disclosed that you had suicidal ideation whenever your mood was
dysphoric. After you were advised of your rights, you elected to
receive copies of documents to be forwarded to the separation
authority, but waived all your other procedural rights.
Subsequently, on 22 October 1996, you were discharged with an
uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of your
diagnosed personality disorder. At that time, you were assigned
a reentry code of RE-4.
In its review of your application, the Board considered all
mitigating factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board
found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your
reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. The
Board noted that applicable regulations authorize an
uncharacterized discharge for individuals who fail to complete
recruit training. The Board thus concluded that there is no
error or injustice in your reentry code which were correctly
sassigned under your gircumstances. Accordingly, your application
yaas* been denied. THe names and votes of the members of the panel
swill be furnished upon request.
‘It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05238-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned under your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08338-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04400-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly asSigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05249-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were diagnosed with a depressive disorder and recommended for an uncharacterized entry level separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04482-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05523-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. However, the Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code should not be changed due to your failure to disclose your psychiatric history and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00285-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05525-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0431 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered our application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...