Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04602-10
Original file (04602-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JSR

Docket No. 4602-10
3 June 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 
  
 
 

   
   

TO: Secretary of the Navy
Subj z ee Pera e Ore Sal Bi a
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD >
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 23 Apr 10 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 25 May 10
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by
removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY)
2011 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered
by the selection board that next convened to consider officers
of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel
as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Bourgeois and
Delorier, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 3 June 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. After Petitioner had failed of selection by the FY 2011
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, he successfully petitioned
this Board for removal of derogatory material from his record.
A copy of the Board's report in his previous case, docket number
938-10, is in enclosure (1).

c. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s current
case has commented to the effect it has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's record be corrected so that he will be
considered by the earliest possible selection board convened to
consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant
colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection for
promotion to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Botan d / ltr

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ops
W. DEAN P F
Executive D °

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01229-09

    Original file (01229-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures (except enclosure (2)), naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board finds Petitioner’s FY 2009 and 2010 failures should be removed as well, since the marks cited above were in his record for both of the promotion boards concerned, and removing all failures is necessary to restore Petitioner to the status he enjoyed, before the FY 2008 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, as an officer who...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01291-01

    Original file (01291-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 and 2001 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. After Petitioner had failed by the FY 2000 and 2001 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Selection Boards, the Headquarters Marine Corps Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09712-06

    Original file (09712-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 and 2008 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01548-04

    Original file (01548-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removal of his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00389-06

    Original file (00389-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed to that grade.2. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04645-10

    Original file (04645-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 and 2011 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as an officer who has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06568-08

    Original file (06568-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 6568-08 17 July 2008 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records From: To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: =.= REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief, specifically,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08949-08

    Original file (08949-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over the subject matter concerned commented to the effect that the PERB action warranted removing Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 2009...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05390-04

    Original file (05390-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03187-11

    Original file (03187-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June 2008 to 31 March 2009 (copy at Tab A) by removing section K (reviewing officer's (RO’s) marks and comments). Enclosure (2) reflects that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has directed the requested...