Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01291-01
Original file (01291-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No: 1291-01
2 July 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj 

:

,

NAVAL RECORD

USMC

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

DD Form 149 dtd 21 Feb 01 w/attachments
- 27 Jul 97
Copy of Subject’s fitrept for 1 Jan 
Memo for record dtd 15 May 01
HQMC CMT memo dtd 8 May 01
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing his failures of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 and 2001
Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. After he submitted his application, he failed
It is presumed that he also
before the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.
requests removal of this failure, so as to be considered by the selection board that is next
convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel
as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 27 June 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, 

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing,law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. After Petitioner had failed by the FY 2000 and 2001 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel

(HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review
Selection Boards, the Headquarters Marine Corps 
Board directed removal of his adverse fitness report for 1 January to 27 July 1997. A copy
of this report is at enclosure (2). The memorandum for the record at enclosure (3) shows

that this report was removed on 13 February 2001, before the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant
Colonel Selection Board convened on 27 March 

2001.

In the advisory opinion attached as enclosure 

(4), the HQMC office having

C.

cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner ’s request to strike his failures of selection for
promotion by the FY 2000 and 2001 selection boards has commented to the effect that this
2002
request has merit and warrants favorable action. The opinion does not address his
failure.

FY 

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
(4), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting removal of
contents of enclosure 
all Petitioner ’s failures of selection for promotion. They agree with the advisory opinion in
finding that the FY 2000 and 2001 failures should be removed. They also find that the FY
2002 failure must be removed as well, to restore the status Petitioner enjoyed before the FY
2CKKl selection board as not having failed of selection.
directs the following corrective action.

In view of the above, the Board

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s record be corrected so that he will be considered by the earliest

possible selection board convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection for promotion to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board ’s

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner ’s record and
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

I

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

NATHAN S. 
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

2

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

3

. .

:

DEPARTMENT OF THE

NAVY
 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

GUANTICO,  VIRGINIA

22134-5103
 

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1600
CMT
8 May 01

MEMORANDUM

FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Subj

: RESERVE AFFAIRS

ADV

Ref:

(a) CMC 

ltr 

161O/MMER/PEMdtd  7 Feb 01

Recommend
1.
failures of s
justification is provided.

request to remove his

The following

.

s request to remove his failures of
the fact that the FYOO and  

2.
se1
promotion boards reviewed an adverse fitness report in his
reference (a) directed the removal
record.
record
of the adverse report and made
more competitive.

Subsequently,

FYOl

record does show significant trends

n his career.

Despite these

romoted to his current rank
tly improved as a field
has a DUI conviction from

grade officer
1997 in his Official Military Performance File that may
prevent his ultimate selection to Lieutenant Colonel.
However, the appropriate selection board should determine
this issue.

.

4.

Point of contact



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04958-01

    Original file (04958-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 1998 to 15 October 1999 (copy at Tab A to enclosure (l).) Petitioner further Review Board requested removal of his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Active Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. Accordingly, your case will for Correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05822-01

    Original file (05822-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Enclosure (4) is the advisory opinion from the HQMC Career Management Team (CMT) recommending denial of Petitioner ’s request to remove his failure of selection before the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. [Petitioner ’s] overall record is less than competitive when compared with his peers. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reporting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00164-02

    Original file (00164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As enclosure (2) reflects, after the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board had convened on 12 March Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) directed the requested corrections of Petitioner ’s performance record. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Schultz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 August 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-00

    Original file (06028-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As reflected in enclosure record as he requested, but modified it by removing the following RS verbiage: qualified for promotion at this time but.. mark in item 19 from “NA” to “yes.” .” Also, as shown in enclosure (2), the HQMC PERB did not remove this report from Petitioner ’s “He is not (3), they changed the g* The fifth contested fitness report, for 28 June to 20 July 1985 (Tab E), from a third RS, also documents only that the following be deleted from the RS comments: Petitioner Is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10443-02

    Original file (10443-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HQMC Career Management Team (CMT), the office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner her failures of selection for promotion, has commented to the effect that this request would warrant approval if the entire fitness report in question were to be removed. Chairperson, Performance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07688-02

    Original file (07688-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected that to show that he did not fail of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Active Reserve Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, allegations of error and injustice on 7 November 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01252-02

    Original file (01252-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the (FY) 2002 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. That Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07632-01

    Original file (07632-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, at enclosure (l), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 August 1999 to 7 April 2000, a copy of which is at Tab A to enclosure (1). In Petitioner ’s prior case, the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA-4), the office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner ’s request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08284-01

    Original file (08284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ’s failures C. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA4) has commented to the effect that Petitioner request to remove his FY 2002 failure of selection has merit and warrants favorable action. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Report -__- _____.__...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02171-06

    Original file (02171-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 through 2006 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards and restoring his status as a major in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR). Finally, they noted that officers removed from the 15Th must have one year in an active status before...