DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 4589-10
27 Sep 10
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions “ee 10, USS L552
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
sitting in executive session, conSidered your application on 27
a 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
n ccordance with administrative regulations and procedures
able to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
ns idered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
| material submitted in papper! thereof, your naval record and
ap pplicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion ” emul alenell by CNO memo 7220 Ser
N130D2/10U0675 of 14 Sep 10, : c
=r
eg
9 Oo oO
HO 'd
e
pes
mw
CT)
Oo
eS
<
C
Fh
=
=,
ry
bo
Q L
a
LE
in
©
t
3
Q
OQ
tr
@
Ou
careful and conscientious consideration of the en
g;oard found that the evidence submitted was insu
blish the existence of probable material en
connection, the Board substantially concurred
ined in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, y
enied. The names and votes of the members of
ished upon request
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind
' I
recoras.
regularity attaches to all officia
1
apply “tion of an offic is
on the demonstrate the
error o
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10694 14
en ee : were ram t rower “vr rr i rer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05021-08
18 Sep 08 5021-08 Dear: This is in reference to your ap pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. record A three-membb sitting in September 2 in accordante with administrative regula applicable considered Cy the Board consisted of your application, plication for correction of your naval er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, xecutive session, considered your application on 18 08. khe advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo lul and conscientious consideration of the en ound...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11559 14
It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command ( contested report for 25 January to 15 March 20098 BR three-member pane sitting in executi 2OLS:. umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3139 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to established entitlement to payment of lump sum leave (LSL). naval record. NR3139-14 f authority set out in Section 6(e) Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it 4s hereby announced that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05503-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 No. 27 Sep 10 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USE US52. A three-member panel of t] S ; applicable statut considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO” N130D2/09U0679 of 14 Sep 10, a copy of which is ter careful and conscientious consideration of the Board found that the evidence submitted was establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11960 14
BK Qa 20 w f the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your 1 2015. eae a ———— se eee New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.