DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 04014-10
11 February 2011
nn
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552. You requested removing the service record page
13 (NAVPERS 1070/613) entry dated 13 February 2007, and you impliedly
requested correcting the Physical Readiness Information Management
System (PRIMS) data for Cycle 2, 2006 to show no failure of the
Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
10 February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the
Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 June 2010, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board was unable to find you did not fail the Cycle 2, 2006 PFA.
The Board found you have not exhausted your administrative remedies
concerning the page 13 entry. In view of the above, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
'
”
Sincerely,
LD SouXq de}
W. DEAN PFEDFF
Executive D2 ic
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01713-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting im executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2011. The Board further neted that the waiver document you provided is dated 2 April 2006, the same date as the Body Composition Assessment (BCA) you failed in cycle 1, 2006, so the Board was unable to find the waiver was in effect when that BCA was conducted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03304-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Do not concur with the request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613 from the record.-equests this action based on his statement that he did not fail any portion of the Spring 2001 PFA cycle. The recommendation to deny Petty Office request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613s is based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03624-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the: discharge authority would have approved a recommendation for Separation. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code, In this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11116-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2006 at age 21 and served without disciplinary incident.While...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09622-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded this factor wags not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code due to your failure to meet the Navy’s PFA requirements. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when an individual fails his fourth PFA in a four year period.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00806-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, except to note you did not request removing any service record page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entry. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11698-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, the separation authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of performance and conduct, and on 20 April...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00244-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 August 2005 at age 18. On 28 November 2005, the separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00352-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your misconduct, which resulted in NUP, deficiencies in your performance, continuous failing of physical fitness tests, and the nonrecommendation for retention; all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03107-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2008. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in his Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.